Final Words

AMD’s Ryzen launch has transformed the company, and really brought proper competition to the CPU space that we’ve not seen in the x86 world for a long time. But Ryzen was first and foremost a desktop competitor, and even though AMD did eventually release a laptop version, it’s not had the same success as its desktop counterpart. The biggest issue is the idle power draw, which is quite high, rendering it less than ideal in an Ultrabook. However the Acer Nitro 5 is not an Ultrabook, but rather a gaming laptop, where the expectations are different and portability is closer to a desktop replacement than a laptop that needs to run off a battery all day long.

Being coupled with an AMD GPU makes the Acer Nitro 5 even more unique. The laptop world has been dominated by NVIDIA's products, so it’s rare to find laptops with AMD GPUs, and even more rare for them to be paired with an AMD CPU. It’s great to see this as an option again, and as we’ve seen, the laptop is competitive as well.

Although the shell of the Nitro 5 is completely plastic, Acer has done a nice job with the styling, and the faux carbon fibre adds some texture and character to a laptop which would otherwise be just flat black plastic. The laptop is plenty strong as well.

There’s also a great cooling system inside, and it never has to work too hard to keep the thermals in check. The CPU didn’t even reach 70°C, and the GPU was only 71°C after a full hour of gaming, and during that hour the sound level only peaked at about 46 dB(A), which is well under some larger gaming laptops. Acer also offers a CoolBoost setting if you want extra cooling, but from what we observed, there’s little reason to ever turn that on. Even better, at idle and light workloads, the laptop is completely silent, since it’s now got a big gaming cooling system to only deal with a U series Ryzen processor.

In terms of performance, the Nitro 5 does very well, especially when you look at the price. It offers far more performance than any Ultrabook, Ryzen equipped or not, and the RX 560X in terms of pure GPU performance can go toe to toe with the GTX 1050. On the CPU side, the Ryzen 5 2500U can’t quite match the 45-Watt Intel quad-cores, but the performance is still quite good.

Clearly Acer had to cut some items to reach their price point, and the display was one of those areas, but even though it can’t do 100% of the sRGB gamut, and even though it’s likely the least accurate IPS display we have ever tested, at the end of the day it is still a 1920x1080 IPS panel, offering good viewing angles, and a good resolution for a gaming laptop of this performance level. Really the only valid criticism of the display on a device like this is that it doesn’t support 1600x900 or 1366x768, both of which would be valuable resolutions for full-screen gaming. With just 1920x1080 or 1280x720 as available 16:9 options, there’s a big jump there in resolution which might be the difference between unplayable and playable.

Even with the shortcomings, the Acer Nitro 5 is still a great value. The AMD powered model is even more so. At $669.99 as a starting price, it’s well under most Ultrabooks in terms of cost, yet delivers far more performance. And with the 256GB SSD model running just another $30, it’s a much better 15.6-inch laptop than many you see on the market with 1366x768 displays and 500 GB spinning drives. If you are after a gaming laptop and you’re on a budget, definitely check this model out.

Wireless, Audio, Thermals, and Software
Comments Locked

90 Comments

View All Comments

  • PeachNCream - Friday, February 15, 2019 - link

    The 1060's showing inside the Surface Book makes it painfully obvious that Microsoft's cooling solution suffers from some pretty severe limitations. Granted, MS wasn't trying to make a gaming system, but something thin and light to compete in more or less the same category where Apple's laptops live so cooling is going to end up taking a backseat.
  • Brett Howse - Friday, February 15, 2019 - link

    The Surface Book 2 is a 15W CPU and the XPS 15 is a 45W CPU, so in games that are CPU limited, the 1050 can outperform. Dota is a great example of this.
  • 29a - Friday, February 15, 2019 - link

    I would like to see benchmarks with a second piece of RAM also.
  • Quad_Tube - Friday, February 15, 2019 - link

    I was also scratching my head when I saw it only had one-stick, albeit 8 GB capacity. Looking forward to seeing how it runs with two sticks (I think the difference would be huge).
  • kpb321 - Friday, February 15, 2019 - link

    If they were actually using the integrated GPU it would be a huge issue as the integrated GPU is often very memory bandwidth starved but as the article mentions the single stick isn't really a big problem when you are running with a discrete gpu.
  • GreenReaper - Monday, February 18, 2019 - link

    It might potentially use more power and so run slower or louder, and for less time. Laptops are a trade-off. As others have mentioned the bandwidth isn't *as* much of an issue with a discrete GPU.
  • Alexvrb - Friday, February 15, 2019 - link

    That doesn't apply to APUs when you're not even using the integrated graphics. Further, since it's a single CCX, RAM clocks don't even matter. Performance would barely budge if they were running 4 x 2. Margin of error difference.
  • Rookierookie - Friday, February 15, 2019 - link

    The screen hinge design for these laptops from Acer has not changed in a while, and anecdotally it's pretty shoddy, prone to splitting open after a couple of years.
  • Annnonymmous - Friday, February 15, 2019 - link

    I own this laptop. The screen hinge is just fine.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Sunday, February 17, 2019 - link

    Are you from the future? Otherwise, how would you know if your hings will be fine after several years of operation.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now