Section by Gavin Bonshor

X570 Motherboards: PCIe 4.0 For Everybody

One of the biggest additions to AMD's AM4 socket is the introduction of the PCIe 4.0 interface. The new generation of X570 motherboards marks the first consumer motherboard chipset to feature PCIe 4.0 natively, which looks to offer users looking for even faster storage, and potentially better bandwidth for next-generation graphics cards over previous iterations of the current GPU architecture. We know that the Zen 2 processors have implemented the new TSMC 7nm manufacturing process with double the L3 cache compared with Zen 1. This new centrally focused IO chiplet is there regardless of the core count and uses the Infinity Fabric interconnect; the AMD X570 chipset uses four PCIe 4.0 lanes to uplink and downlink to the CPU IO die.

Looking at a direct comparison between AMD's AM4 X series chipsets, the X570 chipset adds PCIe 4.0 lanes over the previous X470 and X370's reliance on PCIe 3.0. A big plus point to the new X570 chipset is more support for USB 3.1 Gen2 with AMD allowing motherboard manufacturers to play with 12 flexible PCIe 4.0 lanes and implement features how they wish. This includes 8 x PCIe 4.0 lanes, with two blocks of PCIe 4.0 x4 to play with which vendors can add SATA, PCIe 4.0 x1 slots, and even support for 3 x PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 slots.

AMD X570, X470 and X370 Chipset Comparison
Feature X570 X470 X370
PCIe Interface (to peripherals) 4.0 2.0 2.0
Max PCH PCIe Lanes 24 24 24
USB 3.1 Gen2 8 2 2
Max USB 3.1 (Gen2/Gen1) 8/4 2/6 2/6
DDR4 Support 3200 2933 2667
Max SATA Ports 8 8 8
PCIe GPU Config x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x8*
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
Memory Channels (Dual) 2/2 2/2 2/2
Integrated 802.11ac WiFi MAC N N N
Chipset TDP 11W 4.8W 6.8W
Overclocking Support Y Y Y
XFR2/PB2 Support Y Y N

One of the biggest changes in the chipset is within its architecture. The X570 chipset is the first Ryzen chipset to be manufactured and designed in-house by AMD, with some helping ASMedia IP blocks, whereas previously with the X470 and X370 chipsets, ASMedia directly developed and produced it using a 55nm process. While going from X370 at 6.8 W TDP at maximum load, X470 was improved upon in terms of power consumption to a lower TDP of 4.8 W. For X570, this has increased massively to an 11 W TDP which causes most vendors to now require small active cooling of the new chip.

Another major change due to the increased power consumption of the X570 chipset when compared to X470 and X370 is the cooling required. All but one of the launched product stack features an actively cooled chipset heatsink which is needed due to the increased power draw when using PCIe 4.0 due to the more complex implementation requirements over PCIe 3.0. While it is expected AMD will work on improving the TDP on future generations when using PCIe 4.0, it's forced manufacturers to implement more premium and more effective ways of keeping componentry on X570 cooler.

This also stretches to the power delivery, as AMD announced that a 16-core desktop Ryzen 3950X processor is set to launch later on in the year, meaning motherboard manufacturers needed to implement the new power deliveries on the new X570 boards with requirements of the high-end chip in mind, with better heatsinks capable of keeping the 105 W TDP processors efficient.

Memory support has also been improved with a seemingly better IMC on the Ryzen 3000 line-up when compared against the Ryzen 2000 and 1000 series of processors. Some motherboard vendors are advertising speeds of up to DDR4-4400 which until X570, was unheard of. X570 also marks a jump up to DDR4-3200 up from DDR4-2933 on X470, and DDR4-2667 on X370. As we investigated in our Ryzen 7 Memory Scaling piece back in 2017, we found out that the Infinity Fabric Interconnect scales well with frequency, and it is something that we will be analyzing once we get the launch of X570 out of the way, and potentially allow motherboard vendors to work on their infant firmware for AMD's new 7nm silicon.

Memory Hierarchy Changes: Double L3, Faster Memory Benchmarking Setup: Windows 1903
Comments Locked

447 Comments

View All Comments

  • extide - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Well, I'd hope that was the case -- you're comparing a general purpose CPU core to an array of fixed function hardware.
  • IGTrading - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    We are shocked by the ridiculous "award" granted by AnandTech ....

    So Intel's 500 USD chip only wins in a few Single Threaded benchmarks while using over 70% more power than the rated TDP ?!?

    Bun AMD's Ryzen 3 doesn't get the Gold award ?!

    In this twisted lack of logic, who the heck gets the Gold ?!

    The overpriced, power hungry 9900K ?!? :)))))

    Lack of Editorial independence is a bitch, isn't it ?!
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    For what it's worth, we rarely give out any awards at all. The award tiers are Silver, Gold, Platinum. The 9900K never even got an award, so in our view the new Ryzen chips are overall better products.
  • Oxford Guy - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    What's the award called for pretending that the Intel-only security flaws don't exist nor come with serious performance regressions?
  • Phynaz - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    What’s the award called for being an ignorant AMD fanboy?
  • sausagefingers - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Can we get some moderation in here?
    "Phynaz" Seems much more interested in slinging insults towards his rival fanboys than any discussion about tech.
    He sullied most of the Navi articles comment section with the same trash.
    Learn some social skill dude.
  • Phynaz - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Never gonna happen. My posts create a lot of page views.
  • Meteor2 - Monday, July 15, 2019 - link

    No they don't Phynaz. Apart from the post I'm replying to (because it's short), I skip over your replies. I'm sure most do.
  • Phynaz - Monday, July 15, 2019 - link

    Yup, ignorant.
  • Qasar - Tuesday, July 16, 2019 - link

    yes you are

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now