Section by Gavin Bonshor

X570 Motherboards: PCIe 4.0 For Everybody

One of the biggest additions to AMD's AM4 socket is the introduction of the PCIe 4.0 interface. The new generation of X570 motherboards marks the first consumer motherboard chipset to feature PCIe 4.0 natively, which looks to offer users looking for even faster storage, and potentially better bandwidth for next-generation graphics cards over previous iterations of the current GPU architecture. We know that the Zen 2 processors have implemented the new TSMC 7nm manufacturing process with double the L3 cache compared with Zen 1. This new centrally focused IO chiplet is there regardless of the core count and uses the Infinity Fabric interconnect; the AMD X570 chipset uses four PCIe 4.0 lanes to uplink and downlink to the CPU IO die.

Looking at a direct comparison between AMD's AM4 X series chipsets, the X570 chipset adds PCIe 4.0 lanes over the previous X470 and X370's reliance on PCIe 3.0. A big plus point to the new X570 chipset is more support for USB 3.1 Gen2 with AMD allowing motherboard manufacturers to play with 12 flexible PCIe 4.0 lanes and implement features how they wish. This includes 8 x PCIe 4.0 lanes, with two blocks of PCIe 4.0 x4 to play with which vendors can add SATA, PCIe 4.0 x1 slots, and even support for 3 x PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 slots.

AMD X570, X470 and X370 Chipset Comparison
Feature X570 X470 X370
PCIe Interface (to peripherals) 4.0 2.0 2.0
Max PCH PCIe Lanes 24 24 24
USB 3.1 Gen2 8 2 2
Max USB 3.1 (Gen2/Gen1) 8/4 2/6 2/6
DDR4 Support 3200 2933 2667
Max SATA Ports 8 8 8
PCIe GPU Config x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x8*
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
Memory Channels (Dual) 2/2 2/2 2/2
Integrated 802.11ac WiFi MAC N N N
Chipset TDP 11W 4.8W 6.8W
Overclocking Support Y Y Y
XFR2/PB2 Support Y Y N

One of the biggest changes in the chipset is within its architecture. The X570 chipset is the first Ryzen chipset to be manufactured and designed in-house by AMD, with some helping ASMedia IP blocks, whereas previously with the X470 and X370 chipsets, ASMedia directly developed and produced it using a 55nm process. While going from X370 at 6.8 W TDP at maximum load, X470 was improved upon in terms of power consumption to a lower TDP of 4.8 W. For X570, this has increased massively to an 11 W TDP which causes most vendors to now require small active cooling of the new chip.

Another major change due to the increased power consumption of the X570 chipset when compared to X470 and X370 is the cooling required. All but one of the launched product stack features an actively cooled chipset heatsink which is needed due to the increased power draw when using PCIe 4.0 due to the more complex implementation requirements over PCIe 3.0. While it is expected AMD will work on improving the TDP on future generations when using PCIe 4.0, it's forced manufacturers to implement more premium and more effective ways of keeping componentry on X570 cooler.

This also stretches to the power delivery, as AMD announced that a 16-core desktop Ryzen 3950X processor is set to launch later on in the year, meaning motherboard manufacturers needed to implement the new power deliveries on the new X570 boards with requirements of the high-end chip in mind, with better heatsinks capable of keeping the 105 W TDP processors efficient.

Memory support has also been improved with a seemingly better IMC on the Ryzen 3000 line-up when compared against the Ryzen 2000 and 1000 series of processors. Some motherboard vendors are advertising speeds of up to DDR4-4400 which until X570, was unheard of. X570 also marks a jump up to DDR4-3200 up from DDR4-2933 on X470, and DDR4-2667 on X370. As we investigated in our Ryzen 7 Memory Scaling piece back in 2017, we found out that the Infinity Fabric Interconnect scales well with frequency, and it is something that we will be analyzing once we get the launch of X570 out of the way, and potentially allow motherboard vendors to work on their infant firmware for AMD's new 7nm silicon.

Memory Hierarchy Changes: Double L3, Faster Memory Benchmarking Setup: Windows 1903
Comments Locked

447 Comments

View All Comments

  • Chaython - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    The GTX 1080 is a bottleneck shame on you
  • Kevin G - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Note the resolutions and settings used in testing.
  • RSAUser - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Note the 1080 having bandwidth issues that the 1080 Ti or 2000 series don't.
  • Meteor2 - Monday, July 15, 2019 - link

    I don't understand why they bothered with 4K tests with 1080. Really only the 720p tests make the CPU the bottleneck.
  • Chaser - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Happy for AMD. Happy for consumers. But for a 90% gamer like me, still happy with my recent 9700K purchase. Despite getting "closer", AMD still plays catch up and with superior pricing. I want to see AMD surpass the competition WITH good pricing. That day will come soon I am sure.
  • Arbie - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Yes, the day will come - if AMD can stay alive. They almost didn't. Giving Intel your business after AMD's miraculous comeback forced them to offer better products is rewarding the company that screwed you for 10+ years and screwing the company that fixed that. For a few FPS, for today.
  • mjz_5 - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    True. No one should be supporting intel for pretending 4 cores has been enough for all this time. People got horny for 5% more FPS, which is not even noticeable. Support AMD already!!
  • nc0gnet0 - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Newsflash for you spanky, AMD already did surpass Intel. Your just to blind to see it. The question is, why do people like you see a 7% increase in FPS, that can only be realized if you purchase a $1200.00 video card, and then set your system up ignoring any of the multitude of patches that need to be installed on your precious Intel CPU. Meltdown/Specte/Zombieload, etc etc. And to really make your comments laughable, you cannot even notice that 7% improvement in game (really 150 FPS over 135 FPS...who cares?). All while sucking more power and costing a price premium for performance you can't even see.

    It's no longer about playing catch up, it's about AMD giving you better performance where it actually matters.
  • RSAUser - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    The pricing is better? Here they are about 70% of the price of the Intel equivalent just the CPU, not factoring in cost of getting cooler and that AMD motherboards are cheaper.
  • Arbie - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Why aren't the Intel chip costs increased to account for the *required* cooler ??

    Looks like you're running a $100 unit. A $50 cooler would probably be fine - but even that's a 10-20% adder. This should not have been left out.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now