AMD Unveils Radeon Pro WX 3200: A Professional Graphics Card for Sub-$200
by Anton Shilov on July 2, 2019 3:00 PM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
- AMD
- Polaris
- Radeon Pro
AMD on Tuesday introduced one of the industry’s most affordable professional graphics cards with drivers certified by leading vendors of CAD/CAM software. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes in a low-profile single-slot form-factor and can address the most compact workstations available today.
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 is based on the company's Polaris architecture GPU featuring 640 stream processors that offers up to 1.66 TFLOPS of single precision compute performance. The card carries 4 GB of GDDR5 memory and has four mini DisplayPort 1.4 outputs to drive four 4K displays, or two 5K monitors, or one 8K LCD.
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 card fully supports 10-bit color required by professional graphics applications. Since the board is designed for mainstream CAD/CAM projects it comes with certificates from such ISVs as Adobe, Autodesk, Dassault, Siemens, and others for Windows 10 and Linux operating systems.
Since the card is extremely small (it is just 6.6 inch/168 mm long), it is compatible with almost any desktop workstation that has a PCIe 3.0 x16 slot and can supply up to 50 W of power to the board.
AMD’s Radeon Pro WX 3200 replaces the company’s Radeon Pro WX 3100 board introduced two years ago and brings in enhanced performance along with refined software. Just like its predecessor, the new card will retail for $199
Related Reading:
- AMD Announces Radeon Pro WX 8200: Pro Vega For Under A Grand
- Now (and Almost) Shipping: Radeon Pro WX 9100 and SSG, with New Vega Pro Drivers
- AMD Announces Radeon Pro WX 3100 & WX 2100: Entry-Level Polaris Pro Cards
Source: AMD
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
43 Comments
View All Comments
Gomez Addams - Tuesday, July 2, 2019 - link
Performance. The WX4100 is about 50% faster - 2.4 TF vs 1.66 TF.BOBBYdotTV - Tuesday, July 2, 2019 - link
8 cu's on the 3100 vs 10 cu's on the 3200.Santoval - Tuesday, July 2, 2019 - link
1.66 FP32 TFLOPs? Really?mode_13h - Thursday, July 4, 2019 - link
The S should be upper-case. TFLOPS is a unit, whereas a TFLOP is nonsense.Trillion Floating-point Operations Per Second.
phoenix_rizzen - Friday, July 5, 2019 - link
AMD's site shows it's twice that:Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance
3.3 TFLOPs
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance
104 GFLOPs
mode_13h - Tuesday, July 9, 2019 - link
That's incorrect, as noted below.tipoo - Wednesday, July 3, 2019 - link
Man I love the design and color of their Pro shrouds. The gamer ones should be this minimal.rrinker - Wednesday, July 3, 2019 - link
No no, you're not a 'real; gamer unless your card has configurable RGB lighting and a graphics of some sort of "battle-y" image pasted all over it. Can't be a 'real' gamer if all you are concerned about is the performance and not the fancy looks.mode_13h - Thursday, July 4, 2019 - link
For gaming, you don't want single-slot. In a card this weak, it's unlikely to matter, but dual-slot is a win for noise and longevity.I agree that the aluminum shroud is classy.
Ro_Ja - Wednesday, July 3, 2019 - link
I honestly wanna see a single slot GPU like this from the gaming cards for both Nvidia and AMD, gaming video cards are looking more funny now.