Coming in the wake of last week’s disclosure that their 7nm yields are roughly a full year behind schedule, Intel this afternoon has announced that they are reorganizing the technology side of the company. Key to this change is that Intel is breaking up its monolithic Technology, Systems Architecture and Client Group (TSCG) into several smaller groups, all of which will report directly to CEO Bob Swan. Meanwhile Intel’s chief engineering officer, Dr. Murthy Renduchintala, who had been leading the TSCG, will be departing the company at the end of next week. The reorganization is effective immediately.

As a result of this reorganization, TSCG is being broken up into five groups focusing on manufacturing and architecture. These are:

  • Technology Development: Focused on developing next-generation process nodes. Led by Dr. Ann Kelleher.
  • Manufacturing and Operations: Focused on ramping current process nodes and building out new fab capacity. Led by Keyvan Esfarjani.
  • Design Engineering: A recently-created group responsible for Intel’s technology manufacturing and platform engineering. Led on an interim basis by Josh Walden while Intel searches for a permanent leader.
  • Architecture, Software and Graphics: Developing Intel’s architectures and associated software stacks. Led by Raja Koduri (continuing).
  • Supply Chain: Handling Intel’s supply chain and relationships with important suppliers. Led by Dr. Randhir Thakur (continuing).

It should be noted that while Intel’s brief announcement does not mention last week’s disclosure, the timing and resulting personnel changes are unmistakably related to the 7nm delay. Today’s reorganization is the second shuffle for Intel in as many months, as the company reorganized a number of product groups after Jim Keller departed for (honest to goodness) personal reasons.

Meanwhile, TSCG’s former president, Dr. Murthy Renduchintala, will be departing the company on August 3rd. Renduchintala joined Intel in 2015, and for most of the past half-decade has been responsible for overseeing all of TSCG’s efforts, and especially involved in the development of the company’s next-generation process nodes. Intel’s reorganization announcement makes no specific mention of Renduchintala beyond his date of departure, however it is difficult to imagine that this is anything other than Intel pushing out Renduchintala in light of their process woes. More than anything else, Renduchintala was the face of Intel’s monolithic, vertically-integrated design and manufacturing strategy; a strategy that is no more as Intel seriously investigates building parts of leading-edge processes at competing fabs.

Going forward, the task of developing Intel’s 7nm and 5nm process nodes will be led by Dr. Ann Kelleher. Kelleher gets the incredibly important (but less-than-enviable) challenge of getting Intel’s fab development process back on track, as Intel seeks to regain its crown as the world’s leading chip fab. Kelleher was previously the head of Intel’s manufacturing group, overseeing the recent ramp-up of Intel’s 10nm process. Meanwhile Dr. Mike Mayberry, a central figure in Intel’s labs who was already set to retire this year, will be staying on until then to assist in the transition.

Overall, while Intel’s reorganization is unlikely to dramatically change the company’s day-to-day operations, it’s very much the start of a new era for the company. As Intel’s ongoing manufacturing woes have driven them to look towards outside fabs for more products, the company’s traditional vertically-integrated structure is less than ideally suited for the task – and as much as Intel manufacturing would like to keep Intel-designed products within the company, Intel’s chip and architecture groups need to be able to freely look elsewhere. And this reorganization is going to be an important step in enabling that.

Source: Intel

POST A COMMENT

140 Comments

View All Comments

  • psychobriggsy - Tuesday, July 28, 2020 - link

    He had to announce the 7nm woes in the call - be very sure that this is the best angle on the problem they could present. Intel barely scraped by 10nm failure to disclose issues, now investors are gathering to sue. If Intel are 12 months behind on yields now, then that's THREE quarterly earning calls that they could have raised this problem before they did. Sure, the first one could have been skipped, maybe only a blip - but at 6 months lag it's a risk, it should have been disclosed.

    This re-org will be months in the making, Murthy probably knew he was out a quarter ago, maybe more. It's been kept quiet and internal. The reaction to the earnings call might have brought forward the plans of course. The decisions Murthy made about 7nm are now baked into the process, backing out to start again with a lower-risk profile will take time on its own. Murthy was in charge of all this stuff way before Crow because CEO. He is the right head to roll, especially given the powerplay leaks coming out on Intel.
    Reply
  • zodiacfml - Monday, July 27, 2020 - link

    🙄Not really sure what's going on but feels like politics inside Intel. Reorganization has little to do with the process node tech. If TSMC can do it, Intel can do it better. If there's human skill shortage problem, we would have seen the reorganization prior announcements/roadmaps.
    I also don't see anything wrong with monolithic designs especially with shrinking dies/stagnant core counts. The quad Ryzen 3300x performs well vs the six core 3600 especially in games since it is essentially a monolithic CPU.
    Reply
  • evguy2 - Monday, July 27, 2020 - link

    I worked with that d-bag at Qualcomm when he was trying to run that place into the ground also. They got rid of him just in time... Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade - Monday, July 27, 2020 - link

    Was Dr. Murthy really that bad? Reply
  • Qualquan - Tuesday, July 28, 2020 - link

    Intel should learn from Tesla who has just announced a big hiring spree of engineers in....Shanghai!!
    Now what will Trump say or do?
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade - Tuesday, July 28, 2020 - link

    More Tariffs!!! Reply
  • Quantumz0d - Tuesday, July 28, 2020 - link

    50 Cent Army in Anandtech. And want Biden ? Haha nice joke kiddo Chinese trash ain't get anything in US. Huawei is fucked permanently and TSMC made a move of Fab to US AZ. Move over and spread your trash elsewhere. Reply
  • psychobriggsy - Tuesday, July 28, 2020 - link

    A low-output 20k wpm fab on a non-leading node (by the time it's finished) isn't a major undertaking by TSMC, especially if they can get it subsidised massively. Reply
  • Spunjji - Friday, July 31, 2020 - link

    WTFITS Reply
  • MallikB - Tuesday, July 28, 2020 - link

    Intel needs a tech Guru as a CEO not a cfo turned CEO, AMD did the same mistake after Rich Decker left and suffered, but once they had a tech Guru as the CEO things changed and now they are very successful Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now