Conclusion

Not every motherboard is created equally, nor is every motherboard created with the same functionality as other models. Typically as seen on Intel platforms, it has its consumer-level chipsets such as B560, Z590, Z490, etc, but it also has a level pegged W480 chipset for professional users, which falls outside of its typical industrial level Xeon Scalable platform. Looking at AMD, it doesn't really do this with its desktop platforms, and users looking for workstation-level performance with consumer-level functionality can opt for Threadripper. The other options include Ryzen for desktop, and EPYC for enterprise, cloud, and server, with no real in-between.

When we first got wind of the ASRock Rack B550D4-4L back in January, it piqued our interest as it's the only known board to us that uses AMD's B550 desktop chipset to feature a BMC controller, in this case, an ASPEED AST2500, which is commonly used on professional level boards such as this. Another unique feature of the B550D4-4L is that it has four Intel Gigabit Ethernet ports on the rear, with a fifth designed to provide users access to the board's IPMI, for remote access purposes.

Being on an AMD Ryzen desktop platform, this allows users to use PCIe 4.0, with one full-length PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, and one half-length PCIe 4.0 x4 slot. Typically B550 boards only have one PCIe 4.0 slot, and this is where the B550D4-4L opts for a second PCIe 4.0 slot over a Gen 4 M.2 slot. Instead, the board has one PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 slot, which supports SATA. As we know, the B550 chipset itself uses PCIe 3.0 lanes, and ASRock Rack is routing this through AMD's modular chipset and tracing to add the second PCIe 4.0 x4 half-length slot. Other storage options include six SATA ports, with four from the chipset with RAID 0, 1, and 10 support, and two via an ASMedia ASM1061 SATA controller.

Functionality and usability are two key parameters to look for in a server-focused model, and the B550D4-4L provides plenty of this, with an intuitive and accessible IMPI interface. We've highlighted that the ASRock Rack IPMI is functional in previous reviews, and the B550D4-4L is no different in this regard. There is also plenty of functionality within the firmware, with B550 specific options including access to AMD Ryzen's Precision Boost Overdrive settings, as well as an LN2 mode, which seems completely out of tune with the board's core values. We really wouldn't recommend overclocking a Ryzen 3000 or 5000 series desktop processor on this board, primarily due to the design of the 4+2 power delivery, and the inadequate heatsinks designed to cool it.


The ASPEED AST2500 BMC chip on the ASRock Rack B550D4-4L motherboard

Focusing on the performance, and the B550D4-4L was surprisingly competitive when compared to other B550 models, not just in our system testing, but in our computational benchmarks too. It has Precision Boot Overdrive (PBO) applied by default, which allowed our Ryzen 7 3700X processor to stretch its legs a little, especially when cooled with our Corsair H150i Elite Capellix 360 mm AIO cooler. The only negative in performance came in our DPC latency testing, with our results showing that this board isn't suitable for DAW systems. In the firmware, we did try setting the same settings as other B550 models on test, but no matter what we inputted in relation to memory settings, the latencies wouldn't change on our memory and resulted in DDR4-3200 with CL22 latencies; this would have a negative impact on general compute performance, but with DDR4-3200 CL16, we would expect it to be highly competitive with other models we've tested. 

Final Thoughts

The ASRock Rack B550D4-4L at the time of writing is in a league of its own, with no other AMD B550 series motherboards offering a BMC controller. Another factor to consider here is we haven't been able to find this model anywhere at retail, and we don't have any official MSRP pricing at this time. This makes it tricky, to sum up as it's hard to recommend a model we can't physically get our hands on globally. We do expect the B550D4-4L to be available at retail at some point, and when it eventually is, it offers an interesting professional-level take on AMD's consumer B550 platform.

It keeps up with other B550 in terms of performance which is surprising, but it also has an excellent IPMI interface for easy access and usability. This makes the B550D4-4L one of the most interesting B550 models we've seen so far, especially with four Gigabit Ethernet ports.

Power Delivery Thermal Analysis
Comments Locked

73 Comments

View All Comments

  • bananaforscale - Saturday, May 22, 2021 - link

    This.
  • mode_13h - Friday, May 21, 2021 - link

    > I think 2x2.5G would be more appropriate for the target market of this board.

    Probably the main issue is that support for 2.5 GigE is (still?) uncommon on enterprise switches.

    > Anybody considering 10Gbe is likely on the verge of adopting 25/40/100G anyway

    A lot of people are just starting to move up to 10 GigE. Anything faster doesn't make a lot of sense for SOHO applications.
  • bananaforscale - Saturday, May 22, 2021 - link

    Especially considering how overpriced 10G twisted pair NICs are.
  • mode_13h - Saturday, May 22, 2021 - link

    Eh, I got a pair 2 years ago for < $100 each. I've spent more on a 3Com 10 Megabit PCI NIC, back in the late 90's. Or maybe it was 100 Mbps.
  • Samus - Monday, May 24, 2021 - link

    Probably 100mbps if it was PCI. The 100Mbps ISA NICs were pretty damn pricy because by the time 100Mbps became commonplace, ISA was on its way out and PCI was becoming mainstream (Pentium-era.)

    Even now an 100Mbps ISA network card is $50+
  • PixyMisa - Friday, May 21, 2021 - link

    By preference, but some datacenters use Cat6 and others use SFP. Others have already moved up to 25GbE. 10GBaseT is perfect for workstations, but not necessarily so for servers.
  • mode_13h - Saturday, May 22, 2021 - link

    > some datacenters use Cat6

    Really? For what? Management? Twisted-pair is very energy-intensive at 10 Gigabits, and can't go much above. So, I'd imagine they just use it for management @ 1 Gbps.

    Within racks, I'd expect to see SFP+ over copper. Between racks, it's optical all the way.
  • Samus - Monday, May 24, 2021 - link

    I've toured a lot of datacenters in my lifetime and I can honestly say I haven't seen copper wiring used for anything but IPMI and in extreme cases POTS for telephone backup comms though even this is mostly dead now as it has been replaced by cellular. Even HP ILO2 supports fiber for remote management, and you can bet at the distance and energy profile data centers are working with, they use fiber wherever they can.
  • alexey@altagon.com - Friday, May 21, 2021 - link

    Agree, companies are saving money and customers are paying more.
  • Spunjji - Monday, May 24, 2021 - link

    That's an opinion, for sure.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now