Arm Cortex A520: Same 2023 Core Optimized For 3 nm

The Arm Cortex-A520 isn't architecturally different, nor has it been changed compared with last year's TCS2023 introduction. Instead, it has been optimized for the latest 3 nm process technology, enhancing its efficiency and performance. This core, part of the second-generation Armv9.2 architecture, delivers some additional compute power for everyday tasks in mobile and embedded devices while maintaining peak levels of energy efficiency and reducing power consumption expected from Arm's smallest core.

These architectural tweaks ensure that the Cortex-A520 can maximize the potential of the 3 nm process, achieving higher transistor density and better overall performance without any significant changes to its fundamental design.

The Cortex-A520 showcases a significant 15% energy saving compared to the Cortex-A520 (TCS23). This improvement is critical for devices with prolonged battery life, such as smartphones and Internet of Things (IoT) devices. By optimizing power consumption, the Cortex-A520 ensures efficient performance without compromising energy usage.

The graph on the above slide clearly illustrates the relationship between power and performance for the Cortex-A520 compared to its predecessor, the Cortex-A55, and the previous Cortex-A520 (TCS23). The latest Cortex-A520 explicitly designed for the 3 nm notably improves power efficiency across various performance levels. This means that the Cortex-A520 consumes significantly less power for a given performance point, demonstrating Arm's commitment to providing performance gains across 2024's Core Cluster and focusing on refining things from a power standpoint to the smallest of the three Cortex cores.

 

Arm Cortex A725: Improvements to Middle Core Efficiency Closing Remarks: Pushing Forward on 3 nm For 2024
POST A COMMENT

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • EthiaW - Sunday, June 2, 2024 - link

    I know it takes solid work(and money) to adapt a certain architecture to the newest node, ARM can claim some credit but not all.
    By the way, ARM has a long history of not-so-reliable projection. Remember A57 and X1 that came after much hype only to flop badly? And A72/A78 that was supposed to be minor upgrade but turned out classic? Always view their claim with a pinch of salt.
    Reply
  • mode_13h - Monday, June 3, 2024 - link

    > ARM has a long history of not-so-reliable projection.
    > Remember A57 and X1 that came after much hype only to flop badly?

    Did they fail to hit their power or performance projections? Source?
    Reply
  • eastcoast_pete - Sunday, June 2, 2024 - link

    Question @Gavin and @Ryan: I might have completely missed it, but have Qualcomm and ARM settled their legal fight regarding Qualcomm's right to use the custom Nuvia designs in their SoCs? I almost assume so, as Qualcomm is otherwise proceeding at great risk regarding possible liabilities. Reply
  • mode_13h - Monday, June 3, 2024 - link

    No, I didn't hear anything about it (projections by legal experts were that it wouldn't be wrapped up by now, either), and I'm not seeing any recent hits on it in Google News. Reply
  • skavi - Monday, June 3, 2024 - link

    how much of this article was written by an llm? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now