In addition to the major media aspects covered in the preceding section, there are a number of other factors which need to be touched upon (but don't deserve a full section by themselves).

DLNA

Except for the Boxee Box, the other two media streamers have the ability to act as DMRs (Digital Media Renderers), compliant with the DLNA specifications. This makes it quite easy to push media from a PC onto these devices and through them to the display (with the Play To functionality). However, the DLNA capabilities are quite limited. For example, NTV550 users have ended up being disappointed with the DLNA features of the unit. PlayOn!HD2 also has DLNA DMR support which can be enabled or disabled by the user. It can also act as a uPnP server. I am personally not a big fan of DLNA support. It is good when it works, but, more often than not, I have seen consumers end up getting disappointed.
    
Networking

In this subsection, we present the results of our experiment to determine the efficiency of the networking stack in the media streamer. We restrict ourselves to wired Ethernet connections (even if the unit possesses wireless support). Various test clips with bitrates ranging from 20 to 110 Mbps were streamed from the Western Digital MyBook Live.
    
The NTV550 has a built-in network test option for the configured shares. Initially, I obtained very poor transfer rates (10 - 20 Mbps) with the NAS. A quick search on the forums revealed that the NTV550 networking stack puts the entire onus of 802.3x flow control on the router / switch. Fortunately, my network infrastructure supported it. After performing the requisite configuration, I managed to consistently hit 75 - 85 Mbps in the network test for the MyBook Live shares.

The table below presents the maximum bitrate of the clip which played back without stuttering in our network transfer rate test suite.

Media Bitrate Limitations over Wired Network
Streamer Max. Bitrate
A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD2 42 Mbps (over both SMB and NFS)
Netgear NTV550 50 Mbps (SMB), 55 Mbps (NFS)
D-Link Boxee Box 50 Mbps (SMB), 70 Mbps (NFS)

The A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD2 can act as a NAS device if an internal hard disk is installed. Despite have a GbE port, I could hit up a max transfer rate of only 13 MB/s (and that too, over FTP and not SMB). The USB 3.0 performance in DAS mode is limited only by the transfer rates of the internal hard disk. I was able to regularly hit 70 - 80 MB/s over USB 3.0 to an ASRock CoreHT PC.

Cinavia

Out of the three media streamers being considered today, only the Netgear NTV550 has the ability to play protected Blu-rays, and that too, only with a special 'bdallow' hack. Cinavia detection doesn't exist in the currently available firmware for the NTV550. Netgear initially planned to obtain BDA certification for the unit, but things didn't go according to plan. Without the BDA certification, I am fairly certain that there should be no firmware updates with Cinavia enabled coming around when Cinavia becomes compulsory next February. In any case, all firmware updates for the NTV550 are completely optional.

Since the A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD2 and the D-Link Boxee Box are not AACS licensed, the case of Cinavia doesn't arise.

Blu-ray Region Locks

Region locks are applicable only to BDA certified players, and at first glance, it appears that none of the players should have this problem. Certainly, for the PlayOn!HD2 and the Boxee Box, there are no problems since they can't play back commercial Blu-rays. However, my experience with the NTV550 was a bit strange.

The NTV550 acts like a licensed Blu-ray player even without the bdallow hack in this respect. There are only 5 allowed region changes. Even when a folder backup of a Blu-ray from a different region (with AACS / BD+ protection removed, but region lock not removed) is played, the region lock message is triggered. Of course, this is not a show stopper issue.

Image and Video Quality / Characteristics

All the three media streamers being covered today have support for dynamic refresh rate changes depending on the media being played back. The NTV550 terms this as 'Auto Refresh Rate'. With this enabled, the end user is able to watch the media file without any frame drops / repeats (subject to display support). 23.976 fps videos play back at 23.976 Hz, 24 fps videos at 24 Hz, 25 fps videos at 50 Hz, 29.97 fps videos at 59.94 Hz and so on.

The Boxee Box and the PlayOn!HD2 have support for 23.976/24 Hz only. If you are in NTSC land, and you wish to watch a PAL video, you might be out of luck with respect to matched refresh rates even if your display supports both NTSC and PAL.

It doesn't make sense to run the full HQV benchmark set on any of these media streamers since the knobs to test many of the processing algorithms are simply absent in the options. That said, we did run the cadence detection and denoising clips through the units. The Netgear NTV550 drew a blank in both departments. The A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD2 had options to enable or disable denoising, and it achieved the desired results (though the amount of denoising couldn't be controlled). It failed all cadence detection tests (except for 3:2, which is the most important pattern, anyway). The Boxee Box has the best video post processing capability amongst all the considered streamers. It was able to pass all the cadence detection tests (including esoteric cadence patterns such as 6:4 and 2:3:3:2).

None of the media streamers being covered today offer a native resolution mode. This means that the output is always upscaled by the player itself. The colour space conversion also takes place within the player. All the players allow upto 36bit setting for HDMI deep colour. Output can also be set to RGB Limited / RGB Full / YCbCr 4:2:2 / YCbCr 4:4:4.

The BT.601 vs BT.709 colour space issue is another aspect which needs to be handled properly by the streamers. By default, SD videos are supposed to use BT.601 and HD videos are supposed to use BT.709. Sometimes, the videos are not flagged properly. So, an unflagged HD video should be assumed by the streamer to be using BT.709. If not, the user is bound to see some colour differences as shown in this post. Of the three streamers tested today, the Netgear NTV550 fails this test. The A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD2 and the Boxee Box handle the case of missing flags without any problem.

General Stability

Everything we have seen about the NTV550 so far makes it appear to be the ultimate media player. However, it is in general stability that it flunks the test. Even in stable firmware versions, I often encountered UI freezes (thankfully, the frequency has gone down in the recent version) and lock ups on playing some Blu-ray ISOs and video files. My biggest complaint about the NTV550 is the HDMI output behaviour when the device enters sleep mode (or after the display is turned off without the NTV550 being put in standby). Most of the time, the HDMI output just dies out. Some times, it is possible to regain the output by cycling through the TV Modes, but, at other times, it needs a hard power reset. Such problems don't contribute to a good home theater experience.

The A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD2 is similar to the NTV550 with respect to general stability. In addition to the unit locking up (particularly when something is being played from the internal hard disk and it is also accessed over the network simultaneously), the menus and the remote are a pain to use. My biggest complaint about the unit is that the internal hard disk doesn't get recognized some of the time (usually after getting out from USB slave mode) and a power cycle is necessary for the hard disk to get recognized and the NAS services to start.

The Boxee Box came out to be the most stable of the three media streamers under the scanner today. I didn't experience any lock-ups (Except in cases where the network connection was not stable enough -- but the unit did eventually recover). My biggest complaint about the Boxee Box is the audio dropouts issue over HDMI. Fortunately, the problem seems to have been root caused and a patched firmware expected to appear in another 4 or 5 months.

Power Consumption

The three media streamers being considered today have varying power consumption profiles due to different reasons. The NTV550 came out to be the winner in this department. Being fanless and avoiding the internal hard disk slot has enabled the device to operate between 6.5 and 8.1 W.
    
The A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD2, on the other hand, is let down by the power consumption of the internal hard disk and the fan. Without the internal hard disk, the unit only consumes 6.8 W when streaming videos over the wired network. However, adding the internal hard disk increased this to 13.4 W.

The Boxee Box is let down by the inefficiency of the Intel CE4100. Conuming more than 10W of power in sleep mode is entirely unacceptable. Just for the record, the device consumed between 11.1 W and 13.8 W when streaming videos over the wired network.

Future Support

None of the three streamers considered in this review can be termed perfect as of today. In this situation, can the user expect firmware upgrades in the future? Will they help the unit become better / resolve bugs? In this respect, the Boxee Box is at the forefront. Not only are they quite transparent about the bugs being addressed, the firmware updates have also been more frequent compared to the other two units. A timeframe has already been provided for the HD audio dropouts (which is one of the most glaring issues plaguing the unit), and one is assured of new firmware releases at least till end of Q1 2012. A new Live TV add-on is also scheduled to appear in January 2012. Hopefully, DVR support should follow.
    
The NTV550 comes in next, with beta firmwares turning up once every two months or so. The beta firmwares / test builds are not publicly announced, and I have also found them to resolve only a few bugs at a time (while breaking existing stuff). I think there will probably be a couple of more firmware releases, and I am afraid they will not be able to fix all the issues with the unit.

The A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD2 seems to have the least issues in terms of actual playback ability (even though the unit may not be the easiest to use). The firmware updates have also been quite spread apart. There are still pending bugs to fix, but, with the A.C.Ryan Veolo slated to start shipping next month, I don't think users are going to see a lot of firmware updates for this unit.

Streaming Services Support Final Words
Comments Locked

43 Comments

View All Comments

  • slyck - Tuesday, November 22, 2011 - link

    D-LINK.... the only reason I need to never purchase a Boxee Box.
  • Master_Sigma - Monday, November 21, 2011 - link

    Do any of these devices support playback of 10-bit h.264 encodes? I watch alot of anime fansubs and that community has already started moving over to that standard (most NEW fansubs being released nowadays uses 10-bit encoding). My PC can play them fine but I was wondering if there was an off-the-shelf playback device out now that supports them or if I would buy/build a little HTPC, like the ZOTAC Zbox Nano (hopefully with Llano), to do the job.
  • ganeshts - Monday, November 21, 2011 - link

    Please look in the Video Codecs Compatibility section under H.264 ; Both Boxee Box and NTV550 play such videos with a blank screen. The POHD2 plays with blocking artifacts. You have to rely on PC for playback of such streams for another year or so (at the least)
  • Master_Sigma - Monday, November 21, 2011 - link

    Herp, derp. That's what I get for not reading. Thanks!
  • Nogib - Wednesday, November 23, 2011 - link

    Well if those fansubbers weren't complete elitist dicks we wouldn't have this problem. I've loved being able to play 8-bit h.264 encodes on my WDTV Live Plus as well as my netbook (AMD Ontario acceleration is flawless!). But no, can't run this 10-bit garbage on those. Instead of waiting for proper hardware support, fansubbers assumed we all either have HTPCs or love to sit at a computer desk to watch shows. And once one group started doing it the others all followed suit to make sure their e-penis measured up.

    You can tell I'm only slightly bitter about them changing from 8-bit to 10-bit when there is zero benefit....
  • chrnochime - Tuesday, December 6, 2011 - link

    They do it for free. Don't like it? Go learn Japanese and not have to rely on fansubber to feed your anime needs. Why are you whining about something that you get for free anyway?
  • geniekid - Monday, November 21, 2011 - link

    As others above me have said, it looks like an HTPC is still the most capable media center. That said, for the prices of these three alternatives, I would be hard pressed to recommend building an HTPC unless there's some functionality you just can't live without or you're a hobbyist like me :)
  • cjs150 - Monday, November 21, 2011 - link

    And a great summary of the state of the market

    Which, for media streamers, sucks.

    These are not consumer grade devices and the rate of progress is such that I doubt they ever will be.

    On the other hand it is now possible to build or buy a PC that doubles as a proper part of an AV system, that works well and gets better and better. Problem is it takes a bit of work to get Windows 7, XBMC or whatever OS you prefer, to work they way you want.

    Zotac nano AD10 is a fantastic bit of kit (please lose the fan though) and close to perfect given its very small size or if you want something larger, AMD Motherboards are a great start and there are some really nice cases out there (for example love look of Wesena, just not convinced by build quality/design)

    Sadly you get what you pay for
  • thudo - Monday, November 21, 2011 - link

    http://www.pivosgroup.com/

    I own this and its quite fantastic for $99 and getting GREAT reviews. Devs are also the only in the biz to rapidly response to suggestions from the customer. Sure its NOT perfect but it works quite well.

    Maybe it was too new (Oct 03, 2011) to be reviewed by Anandtech.. :|
  • Destiny - Tuesday, November 22, 2011 - link

    This is a roundup of updates to reviews and articles written for these players on AnandTech from almost a year ago. So basically it is an updated review after the Writer gave them ample time for firmware updates to bring them up to par because at launch they were all horrible and not market ready.

    The Pivos Aios uses the same RealTek 1185 chipset as the AC Ryan that is reviewed here. So features and codec support would be the same because the RealTek SDK does not offer any much difference in custom firmware... so basically it would be a same review as the AC Ryan as mentioned here...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now