Battery Life

While we’ve gotten a good handle on how battery life is on the Snapdragon 801 platform with 1080p displays, we haven’t quite seen the same when it comes to a 1440p display. I’m sure that most people already understand the importance of battery life, so I’ll simply reiterate that our testing conditions are standardized. Everything other than the task at hand is turned off to the best of our abilities, and the display is calibrated as close as possible to 200 nits. The device is then run on an endless loop until it shuts down, starting with a fully charged battery. First, we’ll start with the WiFi web test.

I have to stop proceeding with the analysis with a disclaimer though. With the LG G3, we’ve found evidence of dimming behavior with manual brightness. In the worldwide model that we received, the dimming happens soon after setting the brightness level. A dangerous practice for sure if you only measure display brightness once before conducting battery life tests. However, in the SKT and likely the other Korean units that reviewers received, this dimming process takes around an hour or longer (but with a far shallower drop in actual brightness). It's clear that TI's LM3697 is the chip that controls the backlight brightness, but it's unclear what is setting the brightness curve. LG states that this mechanism is part of their 3A system to reduce display power, and they state that the brightness dimming effect is done in an effort to save power by reducing brightness at a rate that would be unnoticed according to the Weber-Fechener law of perception. This does make sense, but LG should offer the option to disable this functionality one way or another.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

Here, the LG G3 has a major regression in battery life. While the LG G2 had around 11 hours of battery life on WiFi and was competitive with the Galaxy S5 and One (M8), the G3 is around the iPhone 5s in this test. There are a few reasons for this. If we compare battery capacity vs. display size, the LG begins at a disadvantage to HTC's One (M8). In order to equalize this gap, LG would need to fit the G3 with a 3150 mAh battery, something that would be difficult as a result of the loss in volumetric efficiency from the removable battery. The other reason is due to the lower panel efficiency, which is a direct result of the higher pixel density.

Web Browsing Battery Life (4G LTE)

Surprisingly, in the LTE test we see a significant improvement over the LG G2, although it’s still behind the One (M8) and Galaxy S5 for the same reasons that I discussed in the WiFi test. These gains were likely made by improvements to RF and general process improvements such as envelope tracking and lower power process on the modem and other aspects of the SoC from S800 to S801.

Web Browsing Battery Life (2G/3G)

In WCDMA, there are very few surprises. As a result of bottlenecking on the network connection, battery life drops noticeably. The delta between the One (M8) and the G3 is relatively constant in this test as well, around 15-20% less in general.

Overall, the web test shows the power cost of the 1440p panel. However, in many situations the importance of display power efficiency can drop dramatically, especially if other components consume similar levels of power. To take a closer look at this, we turn to the compute-bound battery life tests. The first is GFXBench, which runs an endless loop of T-Rex on the display until the phone shuts down.

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Performance

Here, we see that the LG G3 is between the One (M8) and Galaxy S5 in overall runtime. What’s surprising is that end of run FPS is below both the One (M8) and Galaxy S5, even when compensating for the difference in resolution by multiplying the score by 1.77. This actually places the LG G3 behind the G2.

However, looking at the overall picture, it’s very clear that LG is simply using a throttling mechanism that results in sinusoidal behavior. By averaging the last runs, the realistic end of run FPS is around 13.636. By scaling this to the 1080p-equivalent FPS, we see that the end of run FPS is actually around 24.1357. This means that there’s still a noticeable difference between the One (M8) and LG G3 in overall thermal dissipation capabilities, although not nearly as bad as the end of run FPS value might suggest.

BaseMark OS II Battery Life

The next test is Basemark OS II, and we see that the battery life score sits between both the Galaxy S5 and One (M8), although it does worse than both of them in the battery score taking into account performance. 

BaseMark OS II Battery Score

Overall, the LG G3 does acceptably well in battery life. However, after taking into account the dimming function it’s rather concerning how the G3 fails to keep up with the rest of the competition in this critical area. To really get a good idea what why this is though, we have to look at actual power numbers. This will allow us to truly quantify the power differences.

Charge Time

Charge Time

In this test, the LG G3 trails behind both the One (M8) and Galaxy S5 in charge time, although it's quite close to the One (M8). This is strange, especially because the LG G2 has the same battery size. However, this can be explained by the change to charging protocol, as it seems that the G3 doesn't support Qualcomm's Quick Charge technology. Instead, signalling is done over BC 1.2. As we'll see later in the article, this is due to the charger chip used.

Display Platform Power
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Midwayman - Friday, July 11, 2014 - link

    By the time VR on your phone is a 'thing' you'll have been through a couple more phones most likely.
  • soldier4343 - Thursday, July 17, 2014 - link

    So on your book we should stick with 1080p forever...
  • Tyler_Durden_83 - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    MSM8974AC 2.45 GHz Snapdragon 400
    I don't think that you meant 400 :)
  • JoshHo - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    Whoops. Fixed, it should be correct now.
  • dyc4ha - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    Do you mean Snapdragon 801 in the table?
  • JoshHo - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    Yes. I distinctly recall fixing this same exact typo too. Not sure what happened there.
  • editorsorgtfo - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    IMO the stacked-battery issue is a red herring. Removable batteries haven't hurt Samsung's battery life versus their competition, and a stacked battery didn't break any runtime records for the Moto X. (OTOH, 720p didn't seem to help the Moto X's runtime either, which is odd considering how 1440p hurt the G3 here.)
  • JoshHo - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    The stacked battery design does increase volumetric efficiency. The LG G2 and Galaxy S5 are about the same size in the hand, yet the G2 has a noticeably larger battery. The Moto X is another discussion entirely as it was on a much less power efficient process and the AMOLED technology in the Moto X had much higher power draw than the LCDs available at the time.
  • SleepyFE - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    My old phone once froze so bad i couldn't turn it off by holding the off button. Removing the battery was the only way to get it to work again. I think that's a big enough deal to keep the battery removable.
  • darwinosx - Friday, July 4, 2014 - link

    No that would be bad hardware and software design.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now