Concluding Remarks

The Sony DPT-S1's feature set and pricing make it clear that business users are the primary target market. Posts on various e-reader forums indicate that the device is gaining popularity amongst academics and lawyers. Despite the business / enterprise focus, there is nothing preventing power users from using it as a standard e-reader. In fact, the device, when used in the landscape mode with a two-page thumbnail view (a feature introduced in firmware v1.5.50.1180 released on December 15, 2015), can simulate holding a real book with two pages side by side. The availability of a pen / stylus can also lend itself to some interesting applications for casual users. Writing on the plastic surface of the Sony DPT-S1 feels closer to writing on actual paper compared to glass surfaces in other tablets.


Sony DPT-S1 - Not Necessarily an 'all work, no play' Device

Even though I try to avoid printing out documents / papers and read them on a computer monitor or tablet, I can't totally avoid the usage of a printer. Since purchasing the Sony DPT-S1 a couple of weeks back, I haven't printed out a single document. One of the aims of the Sony DPT-S1 is to reduce paper clutter. I have to say that it succeeds nicely in this respect.

Coming to the business end of the review, we will analyze the pros and cons of the Sony DPT-S1 first.

On the plus side:

  • The unit is lightweight, yet solid. The experience is very similar to carrying a folder with a few sheets of paper.
  • The unit has great ergonomics and is perfectly size for technical documents
  • It is a great vehicle to bring out the advantages of E-Ink
    • No strain on the eyes, thanks to the absence of backlighting
    • Visibility under bright light / outdoor environments is perfect
    • The battery life is great - more than a couple of weeks between charges even with regular use (2 - 3 hours a day with a page or so of writing on each day)
  • Annotation capabilities with the pen input is great for note taking and other business uses.
  • It reads all PDFs - no messing around with DRM, no proprietary file formats, no 'cloud' accounts needed
  • Combination of features make it a very unique product in the market

On the other side:

  • The exorbitant pricing ($800) makes it unsuitable for personal use. There exists better value for money if an E-Ink screen is not a must
  • The PDF viewer could do with some more features to make it more versatile / suitable for non-business use-cases. (more zooming, adjustable cropping to remove white margins etc.)
  • Firmware, in general, could do with some extra features - such as providing additional options for network shares along with the currently existing WebDAV support.
  • Limitations of E-Ink
    • Low refresh rate can hamper user experience when redrawing the screen during document navigation / zooming
    • Absence of color capabilities
  • Adding audio capabilities could help expand the addressable market (targeting audiobooks, for example)
  • At the $800 price point, the presence of just 4GB (3GB usable) of internal flash is disappointing. Availability of a microSD slot alleviates this issue somewhat.
  • A more powerful processor could help in providing a better user-experience with graphics-heavy PDFs.
  • Absence of contrast adjustment (something possible in the Kindle-DX) is a bit disappointing
  • There is no built-in light for reading in the dark (something available in the Kindle Paperwhite)
  • Wear-out of the pen tips could be a worry for heavy users
  • Navigation buttons at the bottom could do with a more pronounced feel. The current design (flush with the rest of the frame) is more suitable for capacitive touch-based implementations.

Despite the list of potential improvements and drawbacks being longer than the positives, the Sony DPT-S1 gets my recommendation for being a unique product in a specific niche. Products based on the 13.3" E-Ink Mobius screen have also been shown at tradeshows by companies like Netronix and Pocketbook, but they remain vaporware.

If the characteristics of E-Ink screens fit your requirements and you need a size-for-size replacement for traditional paper documents, the Sony Digital Paper System DPT-S1 is the perfect fit. It does a surprisingly great job despite being the only such product in the market. We hope Sony continues to provide firmware updates for the product and bring the price down even further.

Software and UI Aspects
Comments Locked

109 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Thursday, December 17, 2015 - link

    Yeah, GREAT review. This is why I love Anandtech. Engadget and the like would never touch something like this.
  • ganeshts - Thursday, December 17, 2015 - link

    I think it is light enough. Any lighter, and I think it would get very flimsy. Hopefully, these types of large screen E-Ink devices come to market soon. Competition will definitely help drive down the price of the DPT-S1 further.
  • Murloc - Friday, December 18, 2015 - link

    yes I have a small one and it's totally fine to read pdf with small pages or slide stacks, but if the documents are A4 you'd have to zoom in and shift around which is simply not possible with the long refresh time unless you want to kill your eyes.

    My sony reader which is much older than this actually features the automatic cutting out of the white space, so I'm surprised it isn't included in this one.
  • Raniz - Thursday, December 17, 2015 - link

    Dimensions in inches and weight in grams? Pick one system (metric)!
  • Kepe - Thursday, December 17, 2015 - link

    Display sizes are reported in inches everywhere. I've never seen a TV, laptop, tablet, phone or a computer display size being reported or advertised in millimeters or centimeters, and I live in Europe.
    BUT this is only true for the diagonal size of a display. When reporting how tall/wide a screen is, for me it would still be more informative if metric numbers were used.
  • ddriver - Thursday, December 17, 2015 - link

    Oddly enough, the only 3 countries in the world still using imperial units are the US... Burma... and... Liberia. Still cherishing the good old days of colonialism I guess. Gotta use imperial, even long after the empire died and went for metric.
  • name99 - Thursday, December 17, 2015 - link

    Myanmar (Burma) does not exactly use imperial units. It uses traditional Burmese units (consequence of being detached from the rest of the world for two generations) but is on the way to SI (metric). The legal formalities have been performed, and I expect that over the next few years as infrastructure is added and replaced, all signage will be in metric.
  • Tams80 - Sunday, December 20, 2015 - link

    The UK uses a mix, and I'm sure there are plenty of other countries (particularly past colonies) that do. In the UK, some of these are very deeply embedded as well; such as miles.
  • Beany2013 - Saturday, December 26, 2015 - link

    In the UK, the generation born in the 60s and 70s are pretty entrenched in imperial, anyone born after that is generally pretty au-fait with both. 1 x 1.6 for km-miles, etc.

    I still get confused with gallons and litres, but as the only time I see it as at the petrol pumps, I'm more concerned with how light my wallet is getting, and how lighter I should really be pushing the right-hand pedal in the car.

    I do use kilos for everything, except my weight, because weighing myself is such a wholly disappointing experience that I've stopped doing it, and that's the only time I used to use stones.

    Actually, let me rephrase that - those of us born in the 80s are mathematical freaks.
  • phoenix_rizzen - Tuesday, December 22, 2015 - link

    To really screw things up, though, different countries measure screen size differently.

    Canada measures viewable sizes (from the inside of the bezel) while the US measures actual screen size (including any parts of the screen hidden underneath the bezel).

    This probably isn't that big of a deal any more with LCD panels, but it was a huge deal back in the CRT days. A 27" TV imported from the US could actually have less viewable area than a 24" TV in Canada.

    Aren't "standards" wonderful? :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now