Epox 4PDA2+

Motherboard Specifications

CPU Interface
Socket-478
Chipset
Intel 82865PE MCH (North Bridge)
Intel 82801ER ICH5R (South Bridge)
Bus Speeds
up to 350MHz (in 1MHz increments)
Core Voltages Supported
up to 1.60V (in 0.050V increments)
I/O Voltages Supported
N/A
DRAM Voltages Supported
up to 2.8V (in 0.1V increments)
Memory Slots
4 184-pin DDR DIMM Slots
Expansion Slots
1 AGP 8X Slot
5 PCI Slots
Onboard IDE RAID
HighPoint HPT372N controller (RAID 0, 1, 0 + 1. Hot Swap capable)
Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394
Eight USB 2.0 ports supported through South Bridge
Agere FW323 IEEE-1394 FireWire (3 ports available)
Onboard LAN
Broadcom 5705 Gigabit LAN (no CSA)
Onboard Audio
C-Media CMI9739A codec
Onboard Serial ATA
Two SATA connectors via ICH5R (RAID 0 & RAID 1 only)
Two SATA connectors via SI3112A (RAID 0, 1 & 0 + 1)
BIOS Revision
05/09/2003

The 4PDA2+ comes with a somewhat unique IDE RAID support powered by HighPoint's HPT372N controller. Two of the four onboard IDE connectors are regulated by the HPT372N while the final two IDE connectors are controlled by the ICH5R South Bridge (but running through the PCI bus), better known as the Primary and Secondary IDE connectors. Not surprisingly Epox went with Silicon Image's SI3112A controller for two of the four Serial ATA connectors onboard the 4PDA2+, as this controller is widely used among high-performance modern-day motherboards, though performance still lags a bit behind SATA controllers from Promise. With the Primary and Secondary IDE connectors, SI3122A Serial ATA connectors, ICH5R Serial ATA connectors, and HPT372N IDE connectors the 4PDA2+ is able to support a grand total of twelve SATA/IDE drives. This is certainly an impressive amount of drive support. We can't image any user being disappointed with such a varied assortment of SATA and IDE options. Unfortunately you won't be able to use the HPT372N for any ATAPI (optical) drives, but keep in mind that you can always use the Primary/Secondary IDE channels.

Epox has a good habit of organizing their BIOS features well, a tradition that is continued with the 4PDA2+. While a FSB maximum of 350MHz isn't anything special, a VDIMM max of 3.30V and a VAGP max of 2.2V are certainly noteworthy. If only the Vcore support were better; currently the highest available option in the 4PDA2+'s BIOS is 1.60V. Epox tells us, however, that a revision 2.0 4PDA2+ motherboard will be released onto the market with Vcore support up to 1.85V just like their 875P-based 4PCA3+. If you're going to be purchasing the 4PDA2+ and are a hardcore overclocker we suggest you wait for revision 2.0 of the 4PDA2+, otherwise go for it if you don't desire more than 1.60 Vcore.

Another nice addition that is rare among motherboards BIOSes is VDIMM and VAGP voltage readings in the PC Health section. VAGP undervolts to about 1.47V-1.48V at default 1.5V VAGP spec, while VDIMM undervolts by just 0.01V. One other interesting thing to note is that Epox doesn't adhere to the default voltage spec of 2.5V set for all modern-day memory modules. Instead Epox goes with 2.6V, which isn't a bad thing if you're a memory performance buff.

We can't stress enough how good Epox is at providing solid and overclocking-friendly BIOSes that are fully functional right from the start. The fact that this motherboard worked exactly as it should have straight out of the box is another thing we take seriously, as it's a common trait among popular, high-performance desktop motherboards.

The addition of IEEE 1394 FireWire support is also worthy of note, as even the most high-end motherboard can sometimes lack basic PCI IEEE 1394 FireWire. Oddly enough Epox chose to implement IEEE 1394 FireWire for their 865PE-based 4PDA2+ and not their 875P-based 4PCA3+. Funnily enough Epox is one of a shrinking majority of motherboard manufacturers whose 865PE motherboard is still slower than their 875P motherboard, meaning Epox has yet to find the workaround to enable PAT-like abilities.

Anyway, Epox chose Agere's FW323 controller for FireWire support. This controller is capable of supporting up to 3 ports, all of which must be activated via the three onboard headers located at the bottom of the PCB below the 5th PCI slot. Thankfully Epox doesn't skimp on accessories and includes the 3-port FireWire bracket to make use of the onboard headers.

The few negative aspects of the 4PDA2+ are, for the most part, fairly trivial. One layout decision we were quite annoyed with was the location of the clear CMOS jumper, which is located in the worst possible position you could image, smack dab in the middle of two mid-sized capacitors and two SATA connectors. We were forced to use a tweezers just to clear the CMOS. One other feature we would have like to have been changed was the omission of Intel's CSA Gigabit bus. Instead the 4PDA2+ integrates onboard Broadcom 5705 Gigabit Ethernet running directly through the PCI bus. As we illustrated here, CSA does make a significant impact on performance. However if you're like most people, you're not transferring large amount of data through Gigabit Ethernet and therefore do not need to worry about this feature.

DFI PRO875: Basic Features Epox 4PCA3+
Comments Locked

18 Comments

View All Comments

  • Zak - Sunday, January 18, 2004 - link

    I bought IS7 after reading this article and I've been having problems. Random resets, then BSOD after changing XP recovery settings. Over the past few months it worsened. In the begining it like once a week maybe. I wasn't concerned, bad driver I thought. Now it won't run more than an hour without BSOD. I have Corsair XMS DDR400 in it. I've played with memory settings for weeks, timings and voltages as well, reinstalled XPPro several times, updated BIOS, got all newest drivers and run out of ideas... I've put a stick of DDR333 because that's all have to test and I still get the same random BSOD, even durnig XP installation. I have no PCI cards in this box. Mushkin calls this board problematic and attributes the memory problems to forced implementation of PAT that is not normally present in 865. I may try getting it replaced by NewEgg but I don't suppose it'll help. I'm thinking about getting a 875 board instead. Zak.
  • Anonymous User - Friday, October 24, 2003 - link

    I would like to see part II of the roundup of the 865 chipset. I wonder what is the delay?
  • Anonymous User - Monday, October 13, 2003 - link

    I thought Part 2 would be out by now at least... There are good new boards out there I'd like to see... Shuttle AB60R (cheap and full featured) and Abit IC7-MAX3 (OTES for mobo power area). I am still looking forward to seeing this, eventually, right guys?
  • Anonymous User - Tuesday, October 7, 2003 - link

    Any comments on newer motherboards? Why hasn't supermicro been tested since 2000?

    Looking to compare supermicro
    Intel s875wp1-e and Super P4SCE (SuperServer 5013C-I (SYS-5013-CI)) for a $50k cluster

    Thanks
    syzygyus@yahoo.com
  • Anonymous User - Friday, August 29, 2003 - link

    Evan, how in the world is #4 going to research your statement when the articles/review comments forum gets purged/is gone now ?
  • Anonymous User - Saturday, August 23, 2003 - link

    Any word on Revision 2 of the Gigabyte 8knxp ultra board yet?
  • Anonymous User - Sunday, August 10, 2003 - link

    I bought the is7 after I read this article. It had many problems. I ended up having to ram this board twice. If you read the abit forum boards you will see alot of problems I am fairly surprised after all the tests this board was put through nothing ever went wrong. I will not buy another abit product period. I will stick to gigabye i've built 6 systems with Gigabyte and yet to have any problems with them. Save for the chipset fans having a low life.
  • Anonymous User - Friday, August 8, 2003 - link

    I bought the Abit IS7 and am completely pleased. One note is that many of the IS7's appear to be getting shipped with the gigabit lan as opposed to the sales brochure stated 10/100. (mine has the gigabit)
  • Anonymous User - Tuesday, August 5, 2003 - link

    How could it be that the Asus p4c 800 de luxe is more expensive then the asus p4p deluxe but in the testresults it is slower?

    I would think i am misinformed by the computershop?

    And the p4c deluxe got a gigabit lan on board, despite mentioning in the summary of this Mb it has not.
  • PixelDoc - Sunday, July 27, 2003 - link

    Error Re: Gigabyte GA-8KNXP MoBo
    This MoBo has 4, not 2 SATA connectors, 2 controlled by ICH5R and 2 more contolled by the SIL3112 chip.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now