Miscellaneous Aspects and Final Words

In order to keep testing consistent across all 4-bay units, we performed all our expansion / rebuild testing as well as power consumption evaluation with the unit configured in RAID-5. The disks used for benchmarking (Western Digital WD4000FYYZ) were also used in this section. The table below presents the average power consumption of the unit as well as time taken for various RAID-related activities. In the general state with the hard disk powered on, but not actively reading or writing data, the power consumption was around 47 W, though it dropped to around 14 W with the disks in sleep mode.

Asustor AS6204T RAID Expansion and Rebuild / Power Consumption
Activity Duration (HH:MM:SS) Avg. Power (W)
Single Disk Init - 19.94 W
JBOD to RAID-1 Migration 08:08:00 31.27 W
RAID-1 (2D) to RAID-5 (3D) Migration 17:31:00 43.65 W
RAID-5 (3D) to RAID-5 (4D) Expansion 18:50:00 54.53 W
RAID-5 (4D) Rebuild 08:23:00 55.25 W

The graphs below show the power consumption and rebuild duration when repairing a RAID-5 volume for the various 4-bay NAS units that have been evaluated before.

Power - RAID-5 (4D) Rebuild
Time - RAID-5 (4D) Rebuild

The Asustor AS6204T is not the most power-efficient NAS around. The ARM-based 4-bay NAS units perform better in that respect. However, Asustor continues to have the shortest rebuild duration for a RAID-5 volume among all the 4-bay NAS units that we have tested before.

Concluding Remarks

Asustor became the first vendor to bring a Braswell-based NAS to the market with the AS6xxx series. The capabilities of the unit make it ideal for power users, SOHOs and SMBs. Since the AS6204T is based on the latest Braswell platform and uses the quad-core Celeron N3150, there is a slight pricing premium over the other 4-bay NAS units based on Intel platforms. With a street price of $670, it is approximately in the same ballpark as the recently reviewed QNAP TS-451+.

Asustor's ADM OS (v2.5 was used in our review) has been receiving numerous fixes and feature additions over the last year. One of the things that I like about Asustor is their prompt attention to feedback and bug reports, as well as speedy resolution of reported issues. Asustor knows that they have a lot of catching up to do in terms of OS features and performance. However, it is good from a consumer viewpoint that they are taking all efforts to bridge that gap as soon as possible.

Coming to the performance aspects, we find that CIFS read performance is very good, while write performance could definitely do with some improvements. NFS support, on the other hand, leaves a lot to be desired (both in terms of performance as well as supported features such as server side locks). The good aspect is that a beta release with a few fixes is already in our hands. The fixes will be migrating to a stable release shortly.

The AS6204T also comes with a HDMI 1.4b port and bundled media playing apps. The NAS can also be used as a media player for 4K videos with support for multi-channel audio over SPDIF as well as HDMI. The presence of AES-NI enables powerful encryption capabilities at a reasonable price point. The unit ships with 4GB of RAM, but users can upgrade easily to 8GB (the unit has two SO-DIMM slots). This could be important if a lot of apps end up running on the NAS simultaneously. Unlike competitors who provide a 2-year warranty for this class of products, Asustor advertises a 3-year warranty for the AS6204T.

Coming to the business end of the review, Asustor's top-end Braswell NAS is power efficient, extensible and performs in an acceptable manner. There is obviously scope for improvement on the software side - both in terms of performance as well as feature set. However, having observed the evolution of ADM over the last couple of years and the commitment shown by Asustor, I can say that they are on the right track.

Multi-Client NFS Performance for Professional Workloads
Comments Locked

29 Comments

View All Comments

  • Der2 - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    Nas life.
  • zeeBomb - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    I have heard a lot about these surverlliance stations for quite some time now...appears to be the next big thing. Thank YOU for delivering these results!
  • asendra - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    I'm hoping Sinology releases in 2016 a 4bay braswell NAS, a DS416+ if you will, hopefully with a N3700. They have already announced some 2016 models with braswell, just not the ones I want.
    I would buy the current DS415+, but because I'm in no need of one right now, I just hope they get to it before I need to make the purchase.
  • galfert - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    I think the DS716+ is the device to get this year. No need to wait for a DS416+. If you need more than two drives you can get the 5 bay expansion model for the DS716+. That is why it is called a DS7xx+ model...because you can have 7 drives. So it is better than a DS4xx model which can't support the expansion module.

    For me the DS716+ is the device I've been waiting for. Powerful Intel CPU, Expandable RAM, Expansion module support, Transcoding of video, virtualization support, Hardware Encryption support. It has everything I need. Previously you had to compromize. I have a DS214play and a DS713+ and the DS716+ can replace both of them.
  • asendra - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link

    You know, I hadn't considered that option. It would be a more expensive one, but it could work, in fact I could use a dx213 instead, wich gives me plenty storage for my needs.
    If when I need to buy one this next year they haven't released yet the new 4bay braswell ones, I might go with this option instead of the older ds415+.
    Another thing I wanted to wait for so I could see how it develops It's Btrfs support.
  • DanNeely - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    Is the rebuild time graph showing numbers in seconds? Hours would be a lot more immediately meaningful. /3600 isn't a particularly easy mental computation.
  • romrunning - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    Your article says: "Their Braswell lineup consists of four models, with each model name following the pattern AS6X0YT, where X (1 or 2) refers to the number of cores in the Braswell SoC in the model and Y (2 or 4) refers to the number of bays."

    Yet the Asustor AS6204T has 4 cores. So by your definition, it should have been named the "AS6404T".

    So it sounds like your definition should be updated.
  • romrunning - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    Forget the above - the wording isn't as clear. I thought you were saying it was a direct relationship where the number = amount of cores. It could have been written that the second numeral denotes whether the CPU is dual-core (X=1) or quad-core (X=2).
  • romrunning - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    This also reminds me - with today's advanced CMS/commenting systems, why can't we edit or delete our own comments on Anandtech??
  • DanNeely - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    Which editor/reviewer do you want to furlough to hire a web developer to replace the comment system?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now