Test Bed and Setup

As per our processor testing policy, we take a premium category motherboard suitable for the socket, and equip the system with a suitable amount of memory running at the manufacturer's maximum supported frequency. This is also typically run at JEDEC subtimings where possible. It is noted that some users are not keen on this policy, stating that sometimes the maximum supported frequency is quite low, or faster memory is available at a similar price, or that the JEDEC speeds can be prohibitive for performance. While these comments make sense, ultimately very few users apply memory profiles (either XMP or other) as they require interaction with the BIOS, and most users will fall back on JEDEC supported speeds - this includes home users as well as industry who might want to shave off a cent or two from the cost or stay within the margins set by the manufacturer. Where possible, we will extend out testing to include faster memory modules either at the same time as the review or a later date.

Test Setup
Intel HEDT i9-9980XE
ASRock X299
OC Formula
P1.40 TRUE
Crucial Ballistix
AMD TR4 TR2 2970WX
TR2 2920X
X399 Zenith
1501 Enermax
Liqtech TR4
Corsair Vengeance
RGB Pro 4x8GB
TR2 2990WX
TR2 2950X
X399 Zenith
0508 Enermax
Liqtech TR4
G.Skill FlareX
GPU Sapphire RX 460 2GB (CPU Tests)
MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G (Gaming Tests)
PSU Corsair AX860i
Corsair AX1200i
SSD Crucial MX200 1TB
OS Windows 10 x64 RS3 1709
Spectre and Meltdown Patched
VRM Supplimented with SST-FHP141-VF 173 CFM fans

Unfortunately due to travel back and forth to the US for AMD’s Horizon Event and Supercomputing 2018, I was unable to look into overclocking performance for this review. We will hopefully cover it in another article.

Many thanks to...

We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our multiple test beds. Some of this hardware is not in this test bed specifically, but is used in other testing.

Hardware Providers
Sapphire RX 460 Nitro MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X OC Crucial MX200 +
MX500 SSDs
Corsair AX860i +
AX1200i PSUs
G.Skill RipjawsV,
SniperX, FlareX
Crucial Ballistix
The Intel Core i9-9980XE CPU Review Our New Testing Suite for 2018 and 2019


View All Comments

  • Arbie - Tuesday, November 13, 2018 - link

    Typo - you wrote "Intel will need to up its game here to remain competitive". Should have been "Intel will need to up its marketing here to remain competitive". Reply
  • eva02langley - Tuesday, November 13, 2018 - link

    Unfortunately, they are selling everything. I would be happy if they were not selling anything. Reply
  • nexuspie - Tuesday, November 13, 2018 - link

    Marketing doesn't work in tech. Tech buyers aren't dumb. People want performance, and today that's Intel by far. On a per-core basis it creams the competitor. Reply
  • Arbie - Tuesday, November 13, 2018 - link

    Ironically stated in pure marketing-speak.

    Tech buyers know that shouting "performance" is meaningless out of context - and that includes a lot more than clock speed. For example price, power, cooling, cores, threading, features, platform, socket life... the list goes on. All conveniently ignored in a slogan like yours, which could have come from an Intel ad.
  • Spunjji - Tuesday, November 13, 2018 - link

    He's dropping classic lines from the "I am an empowered, smart individual and marketing doesn't work on me" playbook. I find it's usually a line trotted out by people on whom marketing works absolute miracles. Reply
  • Kilnk - Tuesday, November 13, 2018 - link

    I've been reading your comments and I love your style. Reply
  • Arbie - Tuesday, November 13, 2018 - link

    "there’s no point advertising a magical 28-core 5 GHz CPU ... if only one in a million hits that value."

    Sure there is: to confuse the market and draw attention away from the competition. As at Computex in June.
  • twtech - Thursday, November 15, 2018 - link

    How about 4.5 GHz? Reply
  • eva02langley - Tuesday, November 13, 2018 - link

    So many refreshes, and so little supply on the shelves. Reply
  • jospoortvliet - Friday, November 16, 2018 - link

    Takes only 9 weeks to be delivered I suppose? And that is just the promise - delays likely. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now