Lakefield: Top Die to Bottom Die

At the top is the compute die, featuring the compute cores, the graphics, and the display engines for the monitors.

It might be easier to imagine it as the image above. The whole design fits into physical dimensions of 12 mm by 12 mm, or 0.47 inch by 0.47 inch, which means the internal silicon dies are actually smaller than this. Intel has previously published that the base peripheral interposer silicon is 92 mm2, and the top compute die is 82 mm2.

Compute Die

Where most of the magic happens is on the top compute die. This is the piece of silicon built on Intel’s most advanced 10+ nm process node and contains the big core, the small cores, the graphics, the display engines, the image processing unit, and all the point-to-point connectivity. The best image of this die looks something like this:

The big block on the left is the Gen 11 graphics, and is about 37% of the top compute die. This is the same graphics core configuration as what we’ve seen on Intel’s Ice Lake mobile CPUs, which is also built on the same 10+ process.

At the top is the single Sunny Cove core, also present in Ice Lake. Intel has stated that it has physically removed the AVX-512 part of the silicon, however we can still see it in the die shot. This is despite the fact that it can’t be used in this design due to one of the main limitations of a hybrid CPU. We’ll cover that more in a later topic.

At the bottom in the middle are the four Tremont Atom cores, which are set to do most of the heavy lifting (that isn’t latency sensitive) in this processor. It is worth noting the relative sizes of the single Sunny Cove core compared to the four Tremont Atom cores, whereby it seems we could fit around three Tremont cores in the same size as a Sunny Cove.

On this top compute die, the full contents are as follows:

  • 1 x Sunny Cove core, with 512 KiB L2 cache
  • 4 x Tremont Atom cores, with a combined 1536 KiB of L2 cache between them
  • 4 MB of last level cache
  • The uncore and ring interconnect
  • 64 EUs of Gen11 Graphics
  • Gen11 Display engines, 2 x DP 1.4, 2x DPHY 1.2,
  • Gen11 Media Core, supporting 4K60 / 8K30
  • Intel’s Image Processing Unit (IPU) v5.5, up to 6x 16MP cameras
  • JTAG, Debug, SVID, P-Unit etc
  • LPDDR4X-4267 Memory Controller

Compared to Ice Lake mobile silicon, which measures in at 122.52 mm2, this top compute die is officially given as 82.x mm2. It’s worth noting that the Ice Lake die also contains what Lakefield has on the base die as well. This top die has been quoted as having 4.05 billion transistors and 13 metal layers. For those playing a transistor density game at home, this top die averages 49.4 million transistors per square millimeter.

Base Die / Interposer Die

The base interposer die is, by contrast, a lot simpler. It is built on Intel’s 22FFL process, which despite the name is actually an optimized power version of Intel’s 14nm process with some relaxed rules to allow for ultra-efficient IO development. The benefit of 22FFL being a ‘relaxed’ variant of Intel’s own 14nm process also means it is simpler to make, and really chip by comparison to the 10+ design of the compute die. Intel could make these 22FFL silicon parts all year and not break a sweat. The only complex bit comes in the die-to-die connectivity.

The small white dots on the diagram are meant to be the positions of the die-to-die bonding patches. Intel has quoted this base silicon die as having 10 metal layers, and measuring 92.x mm2 for only only 0.65 billion transistors. Again, for those playing at home, this equates to an average density of 7.07 million transistors per square millimeter.

On this bottom die, along with all the management for the die-to-die interconnects, we get the following connectivity which is all standards based:

  • Audio Codec
  • USB 2.0, USB 3.2 Gen x
  • UFS 3.x
  • PCIe Gen 3.0
  • Sensor Hub for always-on support

One element key to the base interposer and IO silicon is that it also has to carry power up to the compute die. With the compute die being on top to aid in the cooling configuration, it still has to get power from somewhere. Because the compute die is the more power hungry part of the design, it needs dedicated power connectivity through the package. Whereas all the data signals can move around from the compute die to the peripheral die, the power needs to go straight through. As a result, there are a number of power oriented ‘through silicon vias’ (TSVs) that have to be built into the design of the peripheral part of the processor.

Power and High Speed IO

Here’s a more complex image from a presentation earlier this year. It shows that Intel is using two types of connection from the bottom die to the top die: signal (data) connections and power connections. Intel didn’t tell us exactly how many connections are made between the two die, stating it was proprietary information, but I’m sure we will find out in due course when someone decides to put the chip in some acid and find out properly.

However, some napkin math shows 28 power TSV points, which could be in any of the configurations to the right – those combinations have a geometric mean of 3.24 pads per point listed, so with 28 points on the diagram, we’re looking at ~90 power TSVs to carry the power through the package.

Normally passing power through a horizontal or vertical plane has the potential to cause disturbance to any signalling nearby – Intel did mention that their TSV power implementations are actually very forgiving in this instance, and the engineers ‘easily’ built sufficient space for each TSV used. The 22FLL process helped with this, but also the very low density of the process needed gave plenty of room.

From this slide we can see that the simulations on TSVs in the base die required different types of TSV to be interleaved in order to minimize different electrical effects. High current TSVs are very clearly given the widest berth in the design.

When it comes to the IO of the bottom die, users might see that PCIe 3.0 designation and baulk – here would be a prime opportunity for Intel to announce a PCIe 4.0 product, especially with a separate focused IO silicon chiplet design. However, Lakefield isn’t a processor that is going to be paired with a discrete GPU, and these PCIe lanes are meant for additional peripherals, such as a smartphone modem.

Not to be discouraged, Intel has presented that it has looked into high-speed IO through its die-to-die interconnect.

In this case, Intel battles capacitance as the higher frequency requirements of newer PCIe specifications. In this instance the signal insertion loss difference between PCIe 4.0 and PCIe 5.0 is fairly low, and well within a 0.5 dB variance. This means that this sort of connectivity might see its way into future products.


Also built into the package is the onboard memory – in this case it is DRAM, not any form of additional cache. The PoP memory on top (PoP stands for Package on Package) comes from a third party, and Intel assembles this at manufacturing before the product is sold to its partners. Intel will offer Lakefield with 8 GB and 4 GB variants, both built on some fast LPDDR4X-4266 memory.

In our conversations with Intel, the company steadfastly refuses to disclose who is producing the memory, and will only confirm it is not Intel. It would appear that the memory for Lakefield is likely a custom part specifically for Intel. We will have to wait until some of our peers take the strong acids to a Lakefield CPU in order to find out exactly who is working with Intel (or Intel could just tell us).

The total height, including DRAM, should be 1 mm.

As mentioned earlier in the article, Intel moving to chiplets one on top of the other exchanges the tradeoff of package size for one of cooling, especially when putting two computationally active parts of silicon together and then a big hunk of DRAM on top. Next we’ll consider some of the thermal aspects to Lakefield.

A Stacked CPU: Intel’s Foveros Thermal Management on Stacked Silicon


View All Comments

  • Meteor2 - Thursday, July 2, 2020 - link

    Windows runs just fine on low-powered computers -- as long as there's enough RAM and at least a SATA SSD. Reply
  • Icehawk - Friday, July 3, 2020 - link

    Except this maxes out at 8gb which is barely adequate in W10, 16gb is really necessary unless you like to choke or run super lean. My enterprise laptop sits at 6gb after a fresh boot just on the desktop due to all the corporate junk on there - we have some Lenovos with 8gb soldered RAM and they are hot garbage. Reply
  • yeeeeman - Friday, July 3, 2020 - link

    I have a 2014 Intel atom z3735f tablet with 2gb of ram and swap handles things pretty well. 8GB of RAM is enough for 95% of people. Reply
  • ProDigit - Friday, July 3, 2020 - link

    6GB is what most need for a 64 bit version of windows home.
    8gb only if you're multitasking.
    You could also run linux, and be fine with 2GB.
  • Tomatotech - Friday, July 3, 2020 - link

    personal use computers (laptop / phones / etc) have a hell of a lot going on behind the scenes with constant and multiple cloud interactions and updates. Apple manages with tiny amounts of RAM on their phones because they have an obsessive focus on cutting out cruft and streamlining iOS. MacOS and Windows? Not so much. 8GB is needed for futureproofing.

    If Microsoft is able to revamp Windows on iOS lines then maybe 6GB or 4GB, but Apple themselves have set 8GB as a minimum for for all new MacOS computers, and they are a company that has a history of not putting enough RAM in their cheaper offerings.

    As for the new ARM Mac computers, we will see, but it's unlikely they will have less than 8GB. 16GB minimum is a strong possibility for various reasons when they come out in 2021-ish. IF, and it's a BIG IF, Apple releases a new ultra-long-life device running a mix of MacOS and iOS, then the battery difference of running less RAM might swing it, but we're firmly in making-stuff-up land now.
  • nonoverclock - Friday, July 3, 2020 - link

    Corporate laptops are sort of a different story with all of their agents running. Definitely need more resource to handle all that. On a basic home laptop with Office and a few other apps, most people could probably do ok with 8 GB. Reply
  • Lucky Stripes 99 - Saturday, July 4, 2020 - link

    Agreed. My personal laptop has fewer than a third of the processes and half of the services of what my work laptop has at bootup. The encrypted filesystem is an especially nasty resource hog. I never seem to have a fast enough work laptop with all of that stuff. Reply
  • ProDigit - Friday, July 3, 2020 - link

    Then run linux, like ubuntu. Reply
  • dotjaz - Saturday, July 4, 2020 - link

    So what? Ryzen 4300U can be configured to 10W or lower if they want to complete with it. Besides Van Gogh is around the corner, it's almost certainly a native Quad-core part with RDNA2 for 15W and below. 7W is certainly within reach especially considering 3200U could do that. Reply
  • Skydanthology - Thursday, July 2, 2020 - link

    Yeah, this is for ultra-mobile laptops or dual-screen tablets that require the lowest standby power. Besides, AMD also uses an older process node when making I/O or memory contollers. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now