Test setup

Professional testing requires the emulation of real-world situations but with repeatable results; thus, a perfectly controllable test setup and environment are required, especially for comparable results. Testing the thermal performance of any case with a typical real-world setup technically limits the comparability of the results to this setup alone, as an active system interacts with its environment and the change of a single component would alter myriads of variables. As such, we developed synthetic loads that emulate the thermal output of real systems, which however are passive, steady and quantifiable. As such, the thermal testing now displays the thermal capabilities of the case alone, as if it would have to deal with the entire thermal load by itself, regardless of the system that would be installed inside it. Laboratory data loggers are being used to monitor the PT100 sensors and control the safety relays, which are fully accessible via our custom software. Three such loads have been developed; the ATX version simulates a 200W CPU, 50W VRM, 30W RAM and 4 × 120W GPU card thermal load. Finally, three 3.5" HDD dummy loads have also been created, with each of them converting 30 W of electrical power to thermal, bringing the total thermal load of the ATX test setup up to 850 Watts. As such, the thermal load is immense and only the best of cases will be able to handle it for more than a few minutes, we are also performing a test with a thermal load of 400W, with all of the aforementioned components except the HDD drives at about 42% power, which is more suitable for the majority of cases.

Thermal testing has been performed with all of the case's stock fan operating at maximum speed. Noise testing has been performed with a background noise level of 30.4dB(A). Advanced noise testing is also being performed, in order to assess the ability of the case to dampen the noise of the components installed inside it. This includes the installation of two noise-generating sources (strong fans) inside the case, one positioned approximately over the first expansion slot and one over the CPU area, which generate ≈ 44.2 dB(A) when unobstructed. During the advanced noise test, all stock cooling options of the case are entirely disabled.

Note: The Carbide 400Q can only hold two 3.5" drives, so only two such loads are installed and the actual maximum thermal load is 820 Watts.

Results and discussion

Considering the size and class of the Corsair Carbide 400Q, its performance landed almost exactly where we anticipated it would. Having insulated panels and inferior stock cooling than the SilverStone Fortress FT05, it falls a little behind, but its thermal performance is unexpectedly better than that of the similar (yet significantly smaller) NZXT S340. It cannot outperform but holds its ground well against larger tower cases, such as the Cooler Master MasterCase 5 and the Corsair 450D.

Corsair has installed two of their AF series fans inside the Carbide 400Q, which are designed to provide high airflow with low noise levels, making them the ideal choice as case fans. Combined with the sound dampening material, they made the Carbide 400Q one of the lowest noise ATX tower cases that we have ever tested. The Carbide 400Q showed very good sound dampening capabilities as well, reducing the sound pressure generated by our dummy noise source by 5 dB(A), from 44.2 dB(A) to 39.2 dB(A). The dB(A) scale is logarithmic and that translates to a sound pressure reduction of over 60%, which is easily discernible by the human ear.

Nevertheless, do note that the above acoustic performance figures were for the stock cooling only and with the top panel installed. If the top panel is removed, even if no other fans are installed, all figures increase by nearly 2 dB(A), nearly negating all of the advantage the Carbide 400Q has over most typical ATX tower cases.

The Interior of the Corsair Carbide 400Q Final words and conclusion
POST A COMMENT

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • vanilla_gorilla - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    " It is the balance between them that matters and we feel that Corsair did a fine job balancing their design to the best possible extend."

    Extend? You mean extent? Even that seems poorly worded. Editors asleep over there?
    Reply
  • vanilla_gorilla - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    " It is next to impossible to bent or twist the chassis, even if a lot of force is applied. "

    You mean bend?
    Reply
  • retrospooty - Sunday, May 1, 2016 - link

    Seriously, the world doesn't need another grammar Nazi. This is the internet not an official textbook Reply
  • random2 - Wednesday, May 11, 2016 - link

    This is a journalistic article, by a paid contributor or editor, available for the world to view and is at least a semi permanent record so there is a certain level of professionalism expected. Proofing these articles before posting is not difficult or even that time consuming. Not proofing is just asking to be entered in a race to the bottom...speaking from a journalistic point of view. Reply
  • economymatthew - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    A pretty b itchy response to a free product review Reply
  • jardows2 - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    Apparently you haven't been reading the comments section of AnandTech articles for long. Always someone quick to point out typos and grammatical errors! Reply
  • Samus - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    Ignore the trolls. Odds are this site is older than they are. Reply
  • Valantar - Saturday, April 30, 2016 - link

    Age is a poor differentiator when it comes to whether or not to ignore trolls. Fully grown trolls are just as undeserving of our attention as those still in their larval stages.

    More to the point: sure, pointing out typos and other error in a long article can be helpful (there's a reason why proof reading used to be a profession!), but as with everyone else on the internet, we could do with an extra dose of humility and politeness.
    Reply
  • random2 - Tuesday, May 10, 2016 - link

    Younger trolls care not about grammar. Reply
  • boozed - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    Occasionally the pedantic nonsense is necessary, such as when an error stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of the meaning of words.

    Pointing out typos is tedious however. How hard can it be to implement a "send correction" form? Plenty of sites have them and it gives people somewhere to put their pedantic nonsense without drowning out the main comments.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now