Battery Life

One area that the XPS line has historically done very well was in battery life. This has been a combination of Dell building very efficient devices, as well as providing above-average battery capacities. For the 2020 XPS 13, Dell is offering a 52 Wh battery, which is somewhat smaller than they have in previous models. We shall see what kind of an impact that has on the overall runtime of this notebook. To fairly compare models, all devices are tested with the display brightness set to 200 nits.

Web Battery Life

Battery Life 2016 - Web

Dell starts out strong with an excellent result on our web battery life test. It managed to achieve over 13.5 hours of runtime on this fairly demanding web workload.

Battery Life 2016 - Web - Normalized

The normalized result removes the battery size from the equation so we can get a clearer picture on overall device efficiency, and we can see why the XPS 13 has lost none of its amazing battery life despite Dell shrinking the battery capacity. Dell continues to lead the field here, at least with the 1920x1200 display that we reviewed. Certainly the higher-resolution, wide-gamut 3840x2400 panel would impact this result significantly.

PCMark 10 Modern Office Battery

PCMark 10 Modern Office Battery

A new benchmark added to the stable is the PCMark 10 Modern Office Battery test, which runs through several common office scenarios on a ten-minute loop. If a device is able to finish the tasks quicker, it gets to idle for a higher percentage of the ten-minute test loop, so efficiency is important, but performance also plays a factor. The XPS 13 once again achieved a very strong result, almost matching the web runtime.

Movie Playback

Battery Life Movie Playback

On the movie playback we generally see devices offer even more battery life than the other tests, but the XPS 13 showed such platform efficiency in the previous results that it was not able to extend that much here, but it is still a very strong result.

Battery Life Tesseract

Breaking the movie playback into number of times you can play a very long movie, the XPS 13 almost achieves six complete playbacks of The Avengers before shutting down.

Charge Time

Dell ships a 45-Watt AC adapter with the XPS 13, which charges over a USB-C connector. Since there are Thunderbolt 3 ports on both sides of the notebook, it allows you to charge from whatever side is most convenient, which can help with cable management and is always a nice bonus.

Battery Charge Time

The small charger is plenty to run the notebook, but the charge rate is not spectacular. Luckily, the excellent battery life does mitigate this. Dell does offer an ExpressCharge option which will charge the battery to 80% in one hour and fully charge in two hours, however the user has to specifically choose this if they desire it using the Dell Power Manager software.

Display Analysis Wireless, Audio, Thermals, and Software
Comments Locked

224 Comments

View All Comments

  • eek2121 - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    None of those? Intel has solid mobile offerings. Extremely competitive in performance and power consumption. Try reading the article instead of shilling the comments section.
  • aebiv - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    You've been asleep for awhile eh?
  • Walkeer - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    are you a bot or st.? Did you noticed the ryzen 4000 mobile CPU from AMD, which destorys any and all intel mobile chips in terms like performance, core count and power consumption? in this test, its repsesented by acer swift 3, which just completely annihilated the xps 13 in multi thread and GPU tests
  • Sharma_Ji - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    True that, after looking at those performance charts, buying an intel based machine would be plain stupid.
  • invinciblegod - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    No it's not, mainly because very few companies actually has put Ryzen chips in their premium laptops/Ultrabooks. If you need a laptop right now and not next year, then these machines are fine. Also, any eGPU enthusiasts will have a more limited choice as future Ryzen machines will undoubtedly use thunderbolt only on few devices since it is not built in.
  • invinciblegod - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    Competitive doesn't mean better, it means competitive. Like Qualcomm chips are competitive with Apple's offerings, not because it has equivalent performance, it just means that they are good enough that people using Android won't be compelled to go to iPhones because the chipset is just too far behind (like if Qualcomm was stuck on 3G for some reason or lacked wifi).

    Similarly, if you can do similar things with an Intel cpu compared to an AMD cpu, then they are "competitive" even if they are behind.
  • Operandi - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    Competitive means you are competing. When you are loosing in pretty much every meaningful metric you doing something else and its competing...
  • PeterCollier - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    I didn't know that number of design wins was not a meaningful metric.
  • Rookierookie - Friday, July 17, 2020 - link

    I consider the mobile Ryzen 3000 series to be competitive, and those were losing in every meaningful metric to Intel chips.
  • mrochester - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    Out of interest, where do you get 16:10 AMD Ryzen 4000 laptops from?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now