Flash-based portable drives have become popular for fast storage from the perspective of both content creators and backups-seeking consumers. The advent of high-speed interfaces such as USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20 Gbps) along with Thunderbolt 3 (up to 40 Gbps) have enabled rapid improvements in performance of such portable SSDs over the last few years.

The higher-speed (20 Gbps+) variants had traditionally been restricted to premium devices. Additionally, USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 was turning out to be an odd standard, as USB4 opted to support only features of USB 3.2 Gen 2 from a backwards compatibility perspective. On both the host and device side, ASMedia was the only silicon vendor for more than a year. However, the introduction of more host platforms (such as Intel's latest 600 series chipset) with native support for USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 and the appearance of native 20 Gbps USB flash drive (UFD) controllers from Phison and Silicon Motion have enabled the 20 Gbps standard to gain more traction. Our preview of the Silicon Motion SM2320 showed scope for the appearance of cost-effective USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 portable SSDs with excellent value propositions.

The Kingston XS2000 series is the first portable SSD family to use Silicon Motion's SM2320 platform. Available in three capacities - 500GB, 1TB, and 2TB, the drives promise speeds of up to 2000 MBps. The company sent across samples of all three capacity points in the lineup to put through our rigorous direct-attached storage evaluation process. The review below presents the detailed evaluation report of drives, with emphasis on the aspects that were not covered in the UFD controller preview.

Introduction and Product Impressions

External bus-powered storage devices capable of 1GBps+ performance have become entry-level offerings in the market today, with 2GBps+ starting to become mainstream. Rapid advancements in flash technology (including the advent of 3D NAND and NVMe) as well as faster host interfaces (such as Thunderbolt 3 and USB 3.2 Gen 2+) have been key enablers. Broadly speaking, there are five distinct performance levels in this market:

  • 2GBps+ drives with Thunderbolt 3, using NVMe SSDs
  • 2GBps drives with USB 3.2 Gen 2x2, using NVMe SSDs or direct USB flash drive (UFD) controllers
  • 1GBps drives with USB 3.2 Gen 2, using NVMe SSDs or direct UFD controllers
  • 500MBps drives with USB 3.2 Gen 1 (or, Gen 2, in some cases), using SATA SSDs
  • Sub-400MBps drives with USB 3.2 Gen 1, using UFD controllers

The Kingston XS2000 we are looking at today belongs to the second category in the above list, utilizing flash packaged directly behind the Silicon Motion SM2320 UFD controller.

The package includes the main unit, a rubber sleeve, and a 30 cm. Type-C to Type-C cable rated for 20Gbps operation.

The compact casing is a mix of metal and plastic, and the supplied rubber sleeve supports its IP55 rating for limited protection against dust ingress and splashing of liquids.

The availability of all three capacity points enables us to compare the XS2000 against almost all previously reviewed USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 drives. The list of portable SSDs evaluated as part of this review is provided below:

  • Kingston XS2000 2TB
  • Kingston XS2000 1TB
  • Kingston XS2000 500GB
  • Seagate FireCuda 1TB
  • Silicon Motion SM2320XT 1TB Reference Design
  • Silverstone MS12 DIY USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 SSD with SK hynix Gold P31 1TB NVMe SSD
  • WD_BLACK P50 1TB

CrystalDiskInfo provides a quick overview of the capabilities of the internal storage device. Since the program handles each bridge chip differently, and the SM2320 inside the Kingston XS2000 is quite new, many of the entries are marked as vendor-specific, and some of the capabilities (such as the interface) are deciphered incorrectly. The temperature monitoring worked well, though - just like it did for the reference design.

S.M.A.R.T Passthrough - CrystalDiskInfo

The table below presents a comparative view of the specifications of the different portable SSDs presented in this review. A small note is in order here: While the Silicon Motion UFD controller is the SM2320, it is often interpreted by monitoring programs as the SM2320XT due to its DRAM-less nature. In this review, the SM2320 and SM2320XT are used interchangeably.

Comparative Direct-Attached Storage Devices Configuration
Downstream Port Native Flash Native Flash
Upstream Port USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C
Bridge Chip Silicon Motion SM2320XT Silicon Motion SM2320XT
Power Bus Powered Bus Powered
Use Case Low-power 2GBps-class, compact IP55-rated portable SSD Low-power 2GBps-class, compact IP55-rated portable SSD
Physical Dimensions 69.54 mm x 32.58 mm x 13.5 mm (without casing) 69.54 mm x 32.58 mm x 13.5 mm (without casing)
Weight 28.9 grams (without cable and casing) 28.9 grams (without cable and casing)
Cable 30 cm USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C to Type-C 30 cm USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C to Type-C
S.M.A.R.T Passthrough Yes Yes
UASP Support Yes Yes
TRIM Passthrough Yes Yes
Hardware Encryption N/A N/A
Evaluated Storage Micron 96L 3D TLC Micron 96L 3D TLC
Price USD 240 USD 135
Review Link Kingston XS2000 2TB Review Kingston XS2000 1TB Review

Prior to looking at the benchmark numbers, power consumption, and thermal solution effectiveness, a description of the testbed setup and evaluation methodology is provided.

Testbed Setup and Evaluation Methodology

Direct-attached storage devices (including portable SSDs) are evaluated using the Quartz Canyon NUC (essentially, the Xeon / ECC version of the Ghost Canyon NUC) configured with 2x 16GB DDR4-2667 ECC SODIMMs and a PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe SSD - the IM2P33E8 1TB from ADATA.

The most attractive aspect of the Quartz Canyon NUC is the presence of two PCIe slots (electrically, x16 and x4) for add-in cards. In the absence of a discrete GPU - for which there is no need in a DAS testbed - both slots are available. In fact, we also added a spare SanDisk Extreme PRO M.2 NVMe SSD to the CPU direct-attached M.2 22110 slot in the baseboard in order to avoid DMI bottlenecks when evaluating Thunderbolt 3 devices. This still allows for two add-in cards operating at x8 (x16 electrical) and x4 (x4 electrical). Since the Quartz Canyon NUC doesn't have a native USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 port, Silverstone's SST-ECU06 add-in card was installed in the x4 slot. All non-Thunderbolt devices are tested using the Type-C port enabled by the SST-ECU06.

The specifications of the testbed are summarized in the table below:

The 2021 AnandTech DAS Testbed Configuration
System Intel Quartz Canyon NUC9vXQNX
CPU Intel Xeon E-2286M
Memory ADATA Industrial AD4B3200716G22
32 GB (2x 16GB)
DDR4-3200 ECC @ 22-22-22-52
OS Drive ADATA Industrial IM2P33E8 NVMe 1TB
Secondary Drive SanDisk Extreme PRO M.2 NVMe 3D SSD 1TB
Add-on Card SilverStone Tek SST-ECU06 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 Type-C Host
OS Windows 10 Enterprise x64 (21H1)
Thanks to ADATA, Intel, and SilverStone Tek for the build components

The testbed hardware is only one segment of the evaluation. Over the last few years, the typical direct-attached storage workloads for memory cards have also evolved. High bit-rate 4K videos at 60fps have become quite common, and 8K videos are starting to make an appearance. Game install sizes have also grown steadily even in portable game consoles, thanks to high resolution textures and artwork. Keeping these in mind, our evaluation scheme for portable SSDs and UFDs involves multiple workloads which are described in detail in the corresponding sections.

  • Synthetic workloads using CrystalDiskMark and ATTO
  • Real-world access traces using PCMark 10's storage benchmark
  • Custom robocopy workloads reflective of typical DAS usage
  • Sequential write stress test

A comprehensive overview of the performance of the Kingston XS2000 portable SSDs is provided in the following sections. Prior to providing concluding remarks, we have some observations on the power efficiency aspect of the drives also.

Synthetic Benchmarks - ATTO and CrystalDiskMark
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • citan x - Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - link

    SSD drives are so disappointing. I see these drives with huge numbers and I go buy one thinking that I won't have to wait for files to transfer and then I copy over files and I still get transfer times of minutes even if I only have to transfer a few gigabytes of files.
    The only storage product that I think can be better is the intel optane, but the price on those is ridiculous so I will probably never find out if it is really better or not.
  • meacupla - Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - link

    are you transferring files through USB 2.0 or something?
  • shabby - Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - link

    He's copying files to an old school spinning hd.
  • at_clucks - Thursday, November 11, 2021 - link

    Throw a lot of small files at them and you slash an order or two of magnitude of performance from even the best of SSDs. Otherwise yes, the chain is only as fast as the slowest link.
  • dontlistentome - Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - link

    You're holding it wrong. I get best part of a gigabyte a second on mine. You need a fast drive to feed it with, and it will still be slow with small files, especially if you've not enabled caching in device manager.
  • Tomatotech - Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - link

    He's feeding it from a SSD!

    (A 64GB PATA 1.8" SSD from 2008. Not even SATA. They were in the 1st gen MacBook Airs - I replaced a couple.)
  • easp - Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - link

    I have one sitting on a shelf next to me right now. I'm not sure why I haven't recycled it...
  • Slash3 - Friday, November 12, 2021 - link

    Slap it in an original iPod.
  • Stan11003 - Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - link

    You are missing something. Your experience with SSDs is vastly different than everyone.
  • gfody - Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - link

    the capacities are disappointing, you can make your own 8TB using an enclosure w/an asm2364 chip

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now